Live data from Hacker News

In Colorado, an ambitious new highway policy is not building them

nytimes.com

781–783 of 783 posts

Re: In Colorado, an ambitious new highway policy is not building them

#781
post #777

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’ve lived in Chicago my whole life and have never heard of anyone transferring to cta after taking the metra. Not saying it doesn’t happen, but it’s not scalable solution that people will buy into. The vast majority of people will just drive in that case

Your anecdote versus mine. As an example, there are 12 different bus lines that are directly adjacent to Millennium Station. You barely even have to step outside to use them. Hell, you don’t have to step outside at all to transfer from the blue or red line to Millennium station trains. All loop CTA lines are a 10 minute walk to Union Station and Ogilvie. You really think with these kind of stats that nobody is transf…

The advantage of cars isnt that they are faster than public transit. Its that they are private space and usually a bit more convenient. Arguments about speed will convince no one. The loop buses are doing horribly fyi, the BRT is a complete failure in terms of ridership.

Re: In Colorado, an ambitious new highway policy is not building them

#782

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I thought brake dust would be drastically decreased due to regenerative braking?

There's some offset due to the increased weight from the battery pack. Highway driving is better, city driving is worse. Also, the tires emit more, since wear is also a function of weight.

Looks like it's still expected to a be a big net win for brake wear: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026974912...

Re: In Colorado, an ambitious new highway policy is not building them

#783

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I thought brake dust would be drastically decreased due to regenerative braking?

that sounds right. Tire rubber microplastic generation would go way up, though, because of the vehicle weight. I propose small motor scooters (as is common in asia) as the solution. Cars also take up a godawful amount of space, all the time. Especially in a city. That's the real harm, the tailpipe emissions are trivial compared to the space consumption.

Trivial compared to space consumption... in what sense? That sounds very difficult to compare. I also live in New Mexico, which is a huge state full of next-to-nothing but space, so perhaps I'm missing context.
Post reply on HN