Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, that's what the 'shadow' in 'shadow bank' means: less/different regulation than a normal bank. That's not necessarily a bad thing, btw.
Where's the "bank" in this "shadow bank"? You're describing a casino with a money printer.
Binance to acquire FTX
771–780 of 790 posts
Re: Binance to acquire FTX
#772Earlier quoted context omitted.
> smells like Binance played 4D chess all along It's not really "4D chess" to screw over your competitor to corner the market. That's like, business 101.
Typically you don't expect Bank of America and Chase to do this to each other.
Re: Binance to acquire FTX
#773Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not too familiar but can you elaborate on how the screwing happened.
CZ tweeted "Oh shit, FTX is basically insolvent, we're gonna have to dump all our FTT magic beans!" or words to that effect. Then, when FTX predictably tanked, he stepped in and generously offered to buy out FTX.
Re: Binance to acquire FTX
#774Quoted post unavailable.
This comment was generated by AI. Does HN allow for AI comments on submissions?
But clearly this particular attempt isn't doing so well.
Re: Binance to acquire FTX
#775I'm sorry for your loss.
Re: Binance to acquire FTX
#776Re: Binance to acquire FTX
#777Earlier quoted context omitted.
This comment was generated by AI. Does HN allow for AI comments on submissions?
The guidelines don't specifically call out that case, and I don't think they need to. If someone can automate the process of generating good HN comments I don't see a problem. https://xkcd.com/810/ But clearly this particular attempt isn't doing so well.
Re: Binance to acquire FTX
#778Earlier quoted context omitted.
Centralization is more efficient than consensus building.
Only if the central entity can be trusted not to become a corrupt rent seeker. (Looks meaningfully at TicketMaster)
My point is that things tend towards centralization because the market rewards efficiency.
Re: Binance to acquire FTX
#779Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, because I'm not talking about "how it came into existence," I'm using the actual textbook definition of the word.
There is a LOT of -archy overhead to the Internet.
Re: Binance to acquire FTX
#780Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Because it is currency itself that you measure everything else against. So what? I cannot see the significance of that. There are many possible measures of value. > if you undid all transactions then nothing is left -- but with transaction fees their sum is a negative number. But you need to measure this in something. Yes? So what's the important difference between cryptocurrencies and traditional currencies?
The thing is you can buy anything in this world for money. That's what money is for. Thus, we measure these things in money.