Live data from Hacker News

Binance to acquire FTX

bloomberg.com

771–780 of 790 posts

Re: Binance to acquire FTX

#771
post #652

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, that's what the 'shadow' in 'shadow bank' means: less/different regulation than a normal bank. That's not necessarily a bad thing, btw.

Where's the "bank" in this "shadow bank"? You're describing a casino with a money printer.

What would you say a non shadow bank is? "Money printing" is "just" a reserve ratio near or less than 0.

Re: Binance to acquire FTX

#772

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> smells like Binance played 4D chess all along It's not really "4D chess" to screw over your competitor to corner the market. That's like, business 101.

Typically you don't expect Bank of America and Chase to do this to each other.

Porsche and Volkswagen did.

Re: Binance to acquire FTX

#773

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not too familiar but can you elaborate on how the screwing happened.

CZ tweeted "Oh shit, FTX is basically insolvent, we're gonna have to dump all our FTT magic beans!" or words to that effect. Then, when FTX predictably tanked, he stepped in and generously offered to buy out FTX.

Same thing Soros did to the Bank of England's fake pound.

Re: Binance to acquire FTX

#774
post #762

Quoted post unavailable.

This comment was generated by AI. Does HN allow for AI comments on submissions?

The guidelines don't specifically call out that case, and I don't think they need to. If someone can automate the process of generating good HN comments I don't see a problem. https://xkcd.com/810/

But clearly this particular attempt isn't doing so well.

Re: Binance to acquire FTX

#777
post #774
post #762

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This comment was generated by AI. Does HN allow for AI comments on submissions?

The guidelines don't specifically call out that case, and I don't think they need to. If someone can automate the process of generating good HN comments I don't see a problem. https://xkcd.com/810/ But clearly this particular attempt isn't doing so well.

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

Re: Binance to acquire FTX

#778
post #534
post #315

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Centralization is more efficient than consensus building.

Only if the central entity can be trusted not to become a corrupt rent seeker. (Looks meaningfully at TicketMaster)

I agree with this as well. Efficiency is orthogonal to desirable outcomes.

My point is that things tend towards centralization because the market rewards efficiency.

Re: Binance to acquire FTX

#779
post #632

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, because I'm not talking about "how it came into existence," I'm using the actual textbook definition of the word.

There is a LOT of -archy overhead to the Internet.

Sure, but I think that still fits a common definition of anarchy. The idea isn't "chaos," it's "hey, the thing still works even though there isn't a clear hierarchy."

Re: Binance to acquire FTX

#780
post #757

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Because it is currency itself that you measure everything else against. So what? I cannot see the significance of that. There are many possible measures of value. > if you undid all transactions then nothing is left -- but with transaction fees their sum is a negative number. But you need to measure this in something. Yes? So what's the important difference between cryptocurrencies and traditional currencies?

The thing is you can buy anything in this world for money. That's what money is for. Thus, we measure these things in money.

I don’t see how it answers those questions.
Post reply on HN