Earlier quoted context omitted.
That’s because if you praise a terrible toaster, life for most Americans is unaffected. If you endorse a political candidate, and nudge the election in one direction or other, roughly 50% of Americans will see that move as hostile.
The principle is the same though, whether you’re recommending candidates or toasters. Just because one has more impact than the other, doesn’t make it less ethical to investigate and recommend.
Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris
761–770 of 1001 posts
Re: Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris
#762Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is no neutrality in the face of evil. Journalism and journalists are not supposed to be neutral, but impartial . Ethics are pretty universal.
"There is no neutrality in the face of evil" This is said by both sides, it is equally stupid every time. If ethics are pretty universal, how is it that one party wants no abortions at all and thinks any abortion that isn't absolutely medically necessary is evil and the other party wants abortions right up until viable birth and thinks that anything less than that is evil? Especially when considering that most of the…
Re: Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris
#763Earlier quoted context omitted.
As long as the Post has an editorial page, with people employed to share their opinions, what are they supposed to do? Opinion and reporting are separate- famously the WSJ reporting is quite strong and their opinion section is ... often wrong- but as long as an opinion section exists that's kinda their job, to share their opinion. If you want to get rid of opinion that might be a reasonable thing (with cable news and…
They could share their opinions on the policies of each candidate. That could be great at helping people see perspectives other than their own, so that they can weigh it all up and make their own decision. Doing an endorsement is kind of the opposite of that, because it is essentially telling readers "you don't need to decide, we have done it for you."
In theory your idea would be good, except when I look at the market I don't see anyone actually succeeding at that, which suggests to me that it's not actually a very large market of consumers.
Re: Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris
#764Earlier quoted context omitted.
They retroactively invalidated several years of compensation packages...
"They" of course being the Delaware Chancellory Court in this situation... man people are clueless about how things work.
Re: Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris
#765Earlier quoted context omitted.
What backwater high school did you go to that had you study creationism of all religions? We never covered propaganda in science, in Canada.
Calling an important aspect of most cultures as "propaganda" is rich. You don't have to be religious (I'm not religious and wasn't religious at that time either) to recognize that it's useful to understand those beliefs and how we worked our way to the modern age. That's how you help students to learn our current understanding of the world such that they are less susceptible to eating up blatant lies and believing th…
If you are referring to traditional cultures, they have creation myths which are better suited for social sciences classes.
Showing both sides of the debate is itself a worse form of indoctrination. Haha, look at how creationism is pseudoscience! Now you will be tested on the reasons why. No, let's just not platform propaganda as if it deserved any fair footing in good-faith context of discourse.
Re: Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris
#766Earlier quoted context omitted.
Clear favourite. It might be a toin coss still at this moment, but the odds are getting ever-so-slightly worse for Kamala for many days in a row now. So it's about the trend. On top of that, the growth of the blue firewall in PA is losing steam too early...
Seems like in the language I speak "ever so slightly" and "clear" are in opposition. You can be a clear favorite or a slight favorite. Which is it?
I do hope I'm wrong, but purely looking at the numbers, I don't think I am.
Re: Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris
#767To play Devils Advocate for a moment: Why do we need, or even want, a newspaper to endorse a President? How does it not undermine a paper's journalistic ethics to be neutral and fair?
Re: Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris
#768Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't doubt that, but what company isn't compromised in favor of its owner's interests?
[flagged]
granted, they may also have interests or agendas. They point is we need decentralization!
Re: Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris
#769Well, I guess now democracy dies in anticipation of darkness.