Live data from Hacker News

Orion, our first true augmented reality glasses

about.fb.com

761–770 of 1001 posts

Re: Orion, our first true augmented reality glasses

#761

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Would you actually take a call while running? I wouldn't.

I mean, yes? I stop running while I'm talking, but If my S.O. calls me, I'm definitely going to answer.

Interesting, I can't really think of anything urgent enough that couldn't wait 20 minutes for me to get home, bet we have different lives.

Re: Orion, our first true augmented reality glasses

#762
post #372

I met a lady once, we were in a line at DefCon. She worked on these and was quite concerned that they'd end up on the heads of children, feeding content-reaction biometrics about those children to people who would then use that data to manipulate those children in harmful ways. I'm curious if people think that that's worth worrying about, or if the idea of optimizing ad placement based on whether it makes your pupils…

Cocomelon are already focus group testing their addictive hypnotic kids videos. They don't need millions of kids to develop this crack for kids, just a dozen or so.

Can you give more information on this? I thought Cocomelon was basically just animated nursery rhymes?

Re: Orion, our first true augmented reality glasses

#766

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Speaking of which, I just recently blocked Cocomelon on my kid’s iPad. How insane is it that a company is purposefully putting out crack in video form targeted explicitly at toddlers!? Brought to you by the same people that thought cigarette candy was a brilliant idea.

> my kid’s iPad That is a more fundamental problem.

People said the same thing about kids reading books.

Re: Orion, our first true augmented reality glasses

#767
post #589

I just can't imagine ever buying something like this from Facebook. I know everyone shits on about Google being bad and whatnot, but the things I buy from Google aren't really part of their advertising business. I pay for Workspace and Google Cloud Platform, and those things don't advertise at me. I am more likely to cruise around already logged into Google as a result of using those things, which obviously plays int…

I take a totally different position than you do. If I can't think of a technical reason Google can't get data from something, I assume they do. Why do you think otherwise? Google's full of exactly the same rapacious MBA types that Facebook is, and has the exact same obligations to its shareholders. They're essentially the same business (trap users in your services to mine their data and show them ads). I honestly see…

I find the MBA hate on HN so weird. The founders and leaders of these companies are technologists first. We need to look in the mirror - there's no dodge that software developers, not MBAs, have built these invasive, addictive, misleading, and dangerous products.

Re: Orion, our first true augmented reality glasses

#768
Incredible amount of negativity here.

Huge kudos to Meta for breaking new ground and doing a ton of R&D/M&A to get to this point. Once MicroLED comes on a little further and the form factor shrinks this could be the next consumer electronics platform.

Silicon carbide is really interesting, we need high RI materials to make this work.

Hopefully glass 3D printing or similar will make cheap, Rx waveguides possible.

Re: Orion, our first true augmented reality glasses

#769

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But many cities in the real world already have ads everywhere. If anything, a modified AR device could allow you to detect and remove those.

Complex solution to a simple problem. Just ban ads in cities. Like some cities have already done. Then the ads that are left are just for stuff that is important, e.g. events, music, etc. No need for AI filtering algorithms that have to decide what to block and what to leave.

On the other hand, your solution requires a lot of people to agree and possibly turn away some money, whereas the AR solution (once available) can be individually applied without any decisions by others; only for the one person to decide whether to buy it or not (if they have the money).

So it's not that clear to me which one of these is complex and which simple.

Re: Orion, our first true augmented reality glasses

#770

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> my kid’s iPad That is a more fundamental problem.

People said the same thing about kids reading books.

Is your position that, since people said the same thing about kids reading books, then there is nothing we can give kids that will have a negative outcome on their development? A book can only be read, which requires cognitive effort. iPads can be watched and listened to, which requires no cognitive effort. It's obvious which one kids will choose to do.
Post reply on HN