How does NYT feel about interviewing him literally not more than two weeks ago and trying to frame him as a super smart kid making a dumb mistake?
> How does NYT feel about interviewing him literally not more than two weeks ago and trying to frame him as a super smart kid making a dumb mistake? If you're referring to Andrew Ross Sorkin's interview of SBF, you're misreading the larger editorial framing of that interview. The editorial intent was to get SBF talking and present, in public, evidence of whatever he did or did not do. The motivation of that interview…
Stop being a NYT apologist.
Sorkin threw softballs at SBF again and again, accepted answers given without an iota of concern about the bold lies spewed back, profusely thanked SBF for being so generous with his time over and over again as if it's the NYT that somehow stole billions and tried to lie and get away with it.