Live data from Hacker News

I liberate the ending to Minecraft from Microsoft and give it to you

theeggandtherock.substack.com

761–770 of 778 posts

Re: I liberate the ending to Minecraft from Microsoft and give it to you

#761
post #747

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Im honestly chocked that people react so negatively to this piece. I say this with all the love in the world: it's hard for engineers to think like artists and vice-versa.

Things are not so black and white. It's not that engineers can't appreciate art. The people commenting are saying that the payment was according to what was agreed and the artist's seller remorse is unwarranted. Thats all they are saying. It has nothing to do with art appreciation etc.

To avoid repeating the same comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33909117

I went more in depth here about my perception.

Re: I liberate the ending to Minecraft from Microsoft and give it to you

#762

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What? They paid him exactly what he agreed to. Nothing in the story suggests otherwise.

He didn't agree to hand over all rights to the work

So? He let them use it in the game in exchange for $20k. That’s all they want or need. And before you start with this tiresome license transfer crap, please take a second to read this whole thread to see why that’s not relevant.

Re: I liberate the ending to Minecraft from Microsoft and give it to you

#763

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ready his comment again. It does not matter because Mojang still exists, it's just a Microsoft-owned company now. The contract and everything else related to the game is still property of Mojang, nothing has been transferred.

> It does not matter because Mojang still exists A court may well consider that becoming a wholly owned subsidiary would violate a license, despite being a distinct legal entity[1][2]. Especially when it's just an implied license with no actual agreed definition on both sides. [1] Which is similar to what we're seeing with ARM vs Qualcomm and it should be interesting to see how that shakes out. [2] Mojang into Micros…

You’ve linked an article about a doctrine specific to patent law. Does not apply here. Also, it only speculates that it might be in issue in an acquisition of a subsidiary (vs. a direct merger).

Re: I liberate the ending to Minecraft from Microsoft and give it to you

#764

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The fact that he wrote this long post shows that he is not at peace. Nitpick: technically/scientifically, facts do not have volition.

Are you saying because "facts" are not sentient beings, they cannot be the subject for the verb "to show"?

They have an involvement in the process/phenomenon, but it is the mind that is doing the majority of the work (the actual implementation of "shows"). And, as science has well demonstrated, the mind is a highly unreliable instrument, and is a particularly important one in that it renders "reality" itself.

I'm a big fan of this essay, mainly for this one line:

>> There are these two young fish swimming along and they happen to meet an older fish swimming the other way, who nods at them and says “Morning, boys. How’s the water?” And the two young fish swim on for a bit, and then eventually one of them looks over at the other and goes “What the hell is water?”

https://fs.blog/david-foster-wallace-this-is-water/

Re: I liberate the ending to Minecraft from Microsoft and give it to you

#765
post #474

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But the point is, assuming Charlie is a good agent, Julian would also have made more money (and with less effort) because Charlie would have put in the work to ensure Julian got a good deal.

The point I was replying to was that OP screwed over their agent, which is not fair. Your point that OP would have been way better of if they did let their agent handle it from the beginning was made quite clear already: > Looking back, I can see that I should, at this point, have handed the conversation over to my agent, Charlie, who negotiates my book deals with publishers, and who is a complete darling, and good a…

Yeah, I incorrectly assumed you had misunderstood that, sorry. I read your “there was no exclusivity agreement” to mean “there was no reason for him to involve his agent”.

Re: I liberate the ending to Minecraft from Microsoft and give it to you

#766
post #359

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> You can also easily play forever without achieving this ending. I played from 2013 to 2020 before I visited the End and killed the dragon. Then I realised how OP elytra are and now it's an early game goal to grab a pair.

I still haven't killed the dragon. My son can kill it in under 20 minutes and loves showing me the elytra, but I've never gotten myself one. I just get stuck exploring, digging tunnels, building houses and castles and collecting animals.

> My son can kill it in under 20 minutes

If that's "20 minutes from start of game to end", that's pretty good going. Get him a YouTube channel and get him grinding towards the World Record!

Re: I liberate the ending to Minecraft from Microsoft and give it to you

#767
post #258

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I read almost the whole thing but stopped before the End Poem, because I still haven't defeated the Ender Dragon. I admit I'm not really trying, but might still do so at some point.

> I admit I'm not really trying, but might still do so at some point. It's kinda worth it to get access to elytra and shulker boxes but they do tend to make you a bit OP. Then again to make sensible use of elytra you need a gunpowder farm and once you're building farms like that, you're already on the way to domination...

By the time Minecraft 1.0 came out, modded Minecraft was the only Minecraft for me.

One of the first objectives was always getting something like an Elytra, since it makes the game more pleasant imo.

https://ftb.fandom.com/wiki/Hang_Glider

Despite clocking hundreds upon hundreds of hours in the game, I too have yet to defeat the dragon.

Re: I liberate the ending to Minecraft from Microsoft and give it to you

#768
post #359

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I still haven't killed the dragon. My son can kill it in under 20 minutes and loves showing me the elytra, but I've never gotten myself one. I just get stuck exploring, digging tunnels, building houses and castles and collecting animals.

> My son can kill it in under 20 minutes If that's "20 minutes from start of game to end", that's pretty good going. Get him a YouTube channel and get him grinding towards the World Record!

It is. He claims that with a specific seed, he's done it in much less (4 minutes maybe? I don't know). It's possible his speed-run record with a random seed is 14 minutes now, but I'm not entirely sure about that.

Last year, his class at school (he was 12-13) had their own server where they built lots of stuff. At some point, they divided into two teams. His team was the largest, which he found unfair, so he switched to the smaller team. Then both teams secretly decided to gang up on him, which they did when he wasn't prepared. 20 kids, against him on his own, without his armor on. He had an enchanted golden apple ready, quickly put on his netherite gear, and went to town. Beat them all.

As part of a special projects week the school organised not just a regular sports day, but also an e-sports day. 7 events. He won 6 of them, including one game he'd never played, and got silver on the one game he didn't win.

He's ridiculously good, that much is clear to me now. I'll let him know the internet says he should get a Youtube channel. He doesn't talk much, though, and I think that's kinda necessary for a youtube channel.

Re: I liberate the ending to Minecraft from Microsoft and give it to you

#769
post #726
post #642

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because he explicitly says so and it never was his intention. If you're trying to say that he agreed to it never understanding what he's agreeing to - then that would probably be a non-binding agreement in any legal proceedings.

He also says that he wrote them something along the lines "whatever, let's do the first deal you have offered me" and then intentionally never read the contract. Who knows what they have discussed and agreed to "as friends". The entire situation is very messy. Mojang fucked up by failing to get the contract signed and failing to even notice it. OTOH the writer seems like a contractor from hell who you wouldn't ever w…

Yeah yeah.

And that is why:

> His claim to own the rights in the first place is totally dubious.

Is flat out wrong.

Not to say they have no case, sure, verbal agreements are agreements too.

HOWEVER, when the written contract is significantly different from the verbal agreement, the case that the written contract is binding, is highly dubious.

What, if I agree to pay you a dollar for a stick figure drawing and you send me a contract saying I agree to give you my house, is it binding if I keep the dollar? Did I implicitly agree to 'whatever you want' in an unwritten contract because I agreed to some verbal agreement?

The answer is definitely not.

There's a reason companies use legal written contracts. ...because they unambiguously assign rights; they did not do that. Therefore, it's Mojang's claim to the rights which is dubious, not the author.

Re: I liberate the ending to Minecraft from Microsoft and give it to you

#770

Earlier quoted context omitted.

reminds me recently of voice actors who think they are entitled for a bigger piece of the piece just because the game they worked on for a few hours had financial success. Hubris and pretentiousness at its best.

They are free to negotiate as they are pleased. If the producer feels that they can find a cheaper acceptable alternative they will go with that. If they feel what the voice actor is offering is needed they need to pay for it. > the game they worked on for a few hours Voice acting is a hard job, and it takes more time than a “few hours” to get good at it. If you think anyone can do it certainly you can just pay an an…

> Voice acting is a hard job, and it takes more time than a “few hours” to get good at it. If you think anyone can do it certainly you can just pay an anybody to do it.

So it takes a long time to learn how to take good pictures, and therefore every picture you take after being good should be worth 5k USD or something? that's not how things work at all.

> Voice acting is a hard job,

So all other jobs are easy? That's again pretentiousness at play.

Post reply on HN