Live data from Hacker News

Issue: Claude Code is unusable for complex engineering tasks with Feb updates

github.com

751–760 of 829 posts

Re: Issue: Claude Code is unusable for complex engineering tasks with Feb updates

#751
post #392

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When you submit a /bug we get a way to see the contents of the conversation. We don't see anything else in your codebase.

Was there a change in Claude Code system prompt at that time that nudges Claude into simplistic thinking? Here is a gist that tries to patch the system prompt to make Claude behave better https://gist.github.com/roman01la/483d1db15043018096ac3babf5... I haven’t personally tried it yet. I do certainly battle Claude quite a lot with “no I don’t want quick-n-easy wrong solution just because it’s two lines of code, I wan…

Very interesting. I run Claude Code in VS Code, and unfortunately there doesn't seem to be an equivalent to "cli.js", it's all bundled into the "claude.exe" I've found under the VS code extensions folder (confirmed via hex editor that the prompts are in there).

Edit: tried patching with revised strings of equivalent length informed by this gist, now we'll see how it goes!

Re: Issue: Claude Code is unusable for complex engineering tasks with Feb updates

#752

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AI has all of human knowledge and 100x more than that of just 'stuff' baked right it, in pre-train, before a single token of 'context'. It has way more 'general inherent knowledge' than any human, just as as a starting point.

Yet they never give you replies like: oh, you see how dolphins run in the water taking advantage of sea currents if you are talking about boats and speed. What they will do is to find all the solutions someone did and mix and match around in a mdiocre way of approaching the problem in a much more similar way to a search engine with mix and match than thinking out of the box or specifically for your situation (somethi…

First - I'm doubting your assumptions about "What they will do is to find all the solutions someone did and mix and match".

That's not quite how AI works.

Second - You'll have to provide some comparable reference for how 'humans' come up with creative solutions.

Remember - as a 'starting point' AI has 'all of human knowledge' ingested, accessibly instantly. Everything except for a few contemporary events.

That's an interesting advantage.

Re: Issue: Claude Code is unusable for complex engineering tasks with Feb updates

#753
post #179

I'm the author of the report in there. The stop-phrase-guard didn't get attached but here it is: https://gist.github.com/benvanik/ee00bd1b6c9154d6545c63e06a3... You can watch for these yourself - they are strong indicators of shallow thinking. If you still have logs from Jan/Feb you can point claude at that issue and have it go look for the same things (read:edit ratio shifts, thinking character shifts before the red…

I can't believe that's where we're at, as software devs. I miss predictable outputs, state machines. All those LLM (prompt) based rules make no sense to me. Same with AI WAL. All of it, at some point, will fail.

I present a new name for this - FAKE CODE.

This is simply the next iteration of FAKE NEWS. We have been steadily democratizing and thus lowering the verification standards:

Verified News (AP/Reuters) --> Opinion pieces (Fox/CNN) --> Social media (Tiktok/Youtube).

Verified Code --> Vibe Code

Democracy gave everyone a vote - was that a good thing ?

Social media gave everyone a visual - was that a good thing ?

AI gave everyone a vibe - was that a good thing ?

The trust factor never went away. It just got dispersed and diluted.

Re: Issue: Claude Code is unusable for complex engineering tasks with Feb updates

#754
post #228

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm going absolutely insane with this. Nearly all of my "agent engineering" effort is now figuring out how to keep Opus from YOLO'ing is own implementation of everything. I've lost track of the number of times it's started a task by building it's own tools, I remind it that it has a tool for doing that exact task, then it proceeds to build it's own tools anyways. This wasn't happening 2 months ago.

Can you just tell it not to do that? Maybe you have to remind it every so often once context starts filling up.

It just doesn't listen. Literally a conversation that I just had:

* ME: "Have sonnet background agent do X"

* Opus: "Agent failed, I'll do it myself"

* Me: "No, have a background agent do it"

* Opus: Proceeds to do it in the foreground

* Flips keyboard

This has completely broken my workflows. I'm stuck waiting for Opus to monitor a basic task and destroy my context.

Re: Issue: Claude Code is unusable for complex engineering tasks with Feb updates

#755
post #555

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Based on the recent leaks, their system prompt explicitly nudges the model not to do anything outside of what was asked. That could very well explain why it’s not fixing preexisting broken tests. “Don't add features, refactor code, or make "improvements" beyond what was asked.” https://www.dbreunig.com/2026/04/04/how-claude-code-builds-a...

And it's very valid. Because otherwise you would ask Claude to trim a tree and it would go raze the whole forest and plant new seeds. This was the primary pain point last year, especially with Sonnet.

Whatever prompting OpenAI has with Codex / GPT 5.4 seems superior here then.

It's very surgical and careful around incremental refactoring, etc. but it also doesn't avoid responsibility.

Re: Issue: Claude Code is unusable for complex engineering tasks with Feb updates

#757
post #64

Called it 10 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47533297#47540633 Something worse than a bad model is an inconsistent model. One can't gauge to what extent to trust the output, even for the simplest instructions, hence everything must be reviewed with intensity which is exhausting. I jumped on Max because it was worth it but I guess I'll have to cancel this garbage.

You couldn't ever just trust the output of an LLM what are you talking about

Re: Issue: Claude Code is unusable for complex engineering tasks with Feb updates

#758

Hey all, Boris from the Claude Code team here. I just responded on the issue, and cross-posting here for input. --- Hi, thanks for the detailed analysis. Before I keep going, I wanted to say I appreciate the depth of thinking & care that went into this. There's a lot here, I will try to break it down a bit. These are the two core things happening: > `redact-thinking-2026-02-12` This beta header hides thinking from th…

Claude Code and Opus used to do a great job a few months ago. It seemed to get it right more often than not. It seemed to be far better at figuring out what has to be done and getting it right on the first attempt. This is likely model related since Claude Code has received some bug fixes since.

The list of bugs and performance problems appears to keep growing: reduced usage quotas, poor performance with numerous attempts at getting things right, cache invalidation bugs, background requests which have to be disabled explicitly to avoid consuming the quota too fast, Opus appears to be quantized even with high thinking mode, poor tool use with tool search disabled, broken tool search with tool search enabled, laziness, poor planning, poor execution, gets stuck when debugging simple code issues, writes code which isn't required, starts making changes and executing whatever it wants when told to simply prepare a plan for something, it doesn't follow instructions to use agents as told and numerous other issues with following the instructions.

The quota story is atrocious. It's difficult to get anything done with Claude Code due to the quota reduction. The cache invalidation bugs don't help either.

The tool use is also a pain to deal with. It appears to choose tools randomly with or without tool search. It keeps running custom CLI commands when it has instructions to use Makefile targets. It often ingests the output of some command with hundreds of lines of output without discrimination. It often uses lots of bash grep and find commands when it has better tools available to search across files and to use MCP tools which are far more efficient. It ignores MCP tools most of the time.

This doesn't appear to be an issue with the prompt itself. I'll try to fix the system prompt next to work around some of the issues. It seems to not follow instructions and to do whatever it feels like doing. It comes off as one of those Q2-Q3 quantized models from huggingface.

The impact of the cache invalidation issue, reduced quota, poor model performance and Claude Code bugs together have rendered this service almost entirely useless for me. The poor model performance means that many more attempts are required and more requests are made to the Anthropic API. The Claude Code bugs and design lead to cache invalidation more often. This makes the impact of the reduced quota even worse. It makes a lot more API requests because the model doesn't get it right on the first 1-2 attempts or because it chooses less than optimal strategies to find what it's looking for.

The communication and Anthropic's overall handling of the reported bugs and problems hasn't been that good either.

As for the session ID and other things you might request for debugging, there's nothing special here that's not reported widely on every Reddit thread from several subreddits. I use 200k context with Opus and Sonnet. I use high thinking mode because anything less appears to be complete garbage with extremely poor results. I avoid compact in favor of knowledge transfer markdown files.

It'd be great to see Anthropic fix the caching issues, to improve the quality of the model, to address the Claude Code bugs, to sort out the quota fiasco, to improve their communication skills, to communicate more with their customers and to be more proactive overall. I'll take my money elsewhere otherwise.

Re: Issue: Claude Code is unusable for complex engineering tasks with Feb updates

#760

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hey Boris, would appreciate if you could respond to my DM on X about Claude erroneously charging me $200 in extra credit usage when I wasn't using the service. Haven't heard back from Claude Support in over a month and I am getting a bit frustrated.

Did the receipt show it as being a gift? There's a lot of fraud happening the past few months with Claude Code Gift purchases. Anthropic support is ignoring all of it and just not responding to support requests. Happened to a close friend of mine. A bit of digging revealed the same pattern with fraudulent gift purchases for several other people before I stopped looking. They were also being ignored by Anthropic suppo…

No, the receipt had no indication of it being a gift. Was with my family at the time and suddenly started getting $10 extra usage charges every few minutes. I wasn’t able to toggle off the “auto-reload funds” feature until about $180 had been drained from my checkings. For context, here’s the support ticket I sent in on March 7th.

“Hi Anthropic Support,

I'm a Max plan subscriber and I'm writing about approximately $180 in unexpected Extra Usage charges that appeared on my account between March 3-5, 2026. I attempted to resolve this through your Fin AI chatbot (Conversation ID: 215473382652967).

Here's the situation: - I received 16 separate Extra Usage invoices between March 3-5, ranging from $10-$13 each, all charged automatically. - I was not actively using Claude during this period — I was away from my laptop entirely. - When I checked my usage dashboard, it showed my session at 100% usage despite me not using the product. - My API usage dashboard shows only $70 in total lifetime usage, confirming this is not API-related. - My Claude Code session history shows only two tiny sessions from March 5 totaling under 7KB — nowhere near enough activity to generate these charges.

This appears consistent with known billing/usage tracking issues reported by other Max plan users (GitHub issues #29289 and #24727 on the anthropics/claude-code repo), where usage meters show incorrect values and Extra Usage charges accumulate erroneously. However, it is possible that my account was compromised, and I would like assistance determining if that is the case (or if it really is a bug.)

Either way, I am requesting a refund of the Extra Usage charges from March 3-5 only — I do not want to cancel my subscription.”

Post reply on HN