Looks like an ICOM IC-V82. https://batteriesamerica.com/collections/icom-ic-v8-ic-v82-i...
Well that solves the eternal rivalry between ICOM and Yaesu.
Hezbollah hand-held radios detonate across Lebanon, sources say
751–760 of 1001 posts
Re: Hezbollah hand-held radios detonate across Lebanon, sources say
#752Earlier quoted context omitted.
> legitimate military targets during a time of war Israel and Lebanon are not at war.
The Israeli defense minister, Yoav Gallant, describes it as such. I imagine if pressed he'd argue that Israel is attacking Hezbollah and not Lebanon, but given the extreme civil dysfunction in Lebanon it's equally arguable that Hezbollah is the de facto government for a lot of the country. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israel-planted-exp...
Its a govt within a govt.
Re: Hezbollah hand-held radios detonate across Lebanon, sources say
#753Earlier quoted context omitted.
But by definition the founders of the USA were terrorists. And they knew it too, viz. Benjamin Franklin's famous line 'Gentlemen, we must all hang together or we shall most assuredly hang separately.' Preemptively invalidating all non-state actors is just a way for people with power to avoid challenges to it. Every single oppressive regime describes rebels as terrorists and employs circular arguments to assert its ow…
[flagged]
Re: Hezbollah hand-held radios detonate across Lebanon, sources say
#754This was before these surprise IDF attacks - i wonder how the conversation evolves.
Re: Hezbollah hand-held radios detonate across Lebanon, sources say
#755These sorts of attacks are going to hurt a lot of innocent people. How do they control the munitions and ensure they limit civilian casualties? (I suspect they do not.) It also seems to be lionized in the media as something "impressive" and not "contemptible". I'm not saying it cannot be both! It could be contemptible and impressive, but the media seems comfortable just being impressed. If North Korea or Iran or Russ…
Re: Hezbollah hand-held radios detonate across Lebanon, sources say
#756Earlier quoted context omitted.
If they have the capacity to intercept the supply chain, they almost certainly have been implanting listening devices in electronics of all sorts. If you're not in Hezbollah or Hamas you probably don't need to worry about getting blown up by your phone, but if you've got a large platform and been very critical of Israel, it wouldn't be a huge stretch to imagine that you might get personally targeted by communication…
Not so sure you need anything to do with Hezbollah to be afraid. One example of many. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/02/israel-opt-ne...
(Obviously, voting in Hamas was a huge mistake, but Palestinians probably didn't expect Hamas to make that the last election. Unfortunately, you only need to elect a totalitarian government once.)
Re: Hezbollah hand-held radios detonate across Lebanon, sources say
#757Earlier quoted context omitted.
Younger Americans are by in large not buying Israel's bullshit. American support for Israel is a generational phenomenon and that support will be aging and dying out of the political process in the next 20 or so years, after that Israel will be on their own to face all the enemies they've made, and that won't end well for them. I think this is why they've been so aggressive in recent years. They know their window of…
[flagged]
Re: Hezbollah hand-held radios detonate across Lebanon, sources say
#758[flagged]
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2008/mar/18/northernire...
Re: Hezbollah hand-held radios detonate across Lebanon, sources say
#759I'm genuinely curious: how is this not considered terrorism on Israel's part? (or is it considered terrorism?) From a tactical standpoint, this is very similar, and the only big difference I see is that this is technologically more advanced/more complex than just planting a bomb or something. If it's not terrorism, what is the differentiating factor(s)? *side note: I'm quite sure other western countries have used tac…
I'm not convinced this was a terror attack and I think Israel is within its rights to target Hezbollah, but here's a question: If the assailant and target were reversed, would Western media hesitate at all to call it terrorism? Or, forget Hezbollah and Israel. If ISIS had detonated thousands of explosive devices all over, e.g., the UK injuring and killing hundreds of UK military personnel and some civilians, would th…
If it is actually done to degrade the capabilities of the UK military so ISIS could use its fighters to chase them out of Iraq, or maybe, conquer a part of England - its an act of war and is actually worse from a UK POV. Calling it a terror attack would be silly.
People are biased to treat wars as better then terror because wars have rules and often involve good people trying to defend their country. But from a country's POV a terror organization is usually way less dangerous than a competent enemy military attacking.
Terror is usually done because someone lacks military competence and is willing to play dirty to even the playing field.
The establishment is so aggressive in condemning terrorism, because its easier to deal aggressively with a small terrorist organization before it becomes an established military and carves its own autonomous place on the world stage.
ISIS is a good example, it used a lot of terror tactics, but its goal was to create a country.
Re: Hezbollah hand-held radios detonate across Lebanon, sources say
#760Earlier quoted context omitted.
Younger Americans are by in large not buying Israel's bullshit. American support for Israel is a generational phenomenon and that support will be aging and dying out of the political process in the next 20 or so years, after that Israel will be on their own to face all the enemies they've made, and that won't end well for them. I think this is why they've been so aggressive in recent years. They know their window of…
[flagged]