Live data from Hacker News

WhatsApp introduces ads in its app

nytimes.com

741–750 of 1001 posts

Re: WhatsApp introduces ads in its app

#741
post #717

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Australian? We're one of only a few countries[1] who call the game Chinese Whispers. 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_game

Not the OP, but FWIW I'm British and we also called it that in the late 80s.

Don't we still call it that now?

Re: WhatsApp introduces ads in its app

#742
post #471

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Seem to remember paying for WhatsApp when I first downloaded it. I’d be happy to keep paying. Just not the amount that they can make from advertising. Solution maybe to ban intrusive advertising so they can’t make a lot of money from it that way?

I would be happy to pay few bucks a month for an instant messaging service to make sure it's independent. I consider it basic necessity like internet on my phone.

The problem is the fragmentation. We need federation first across all providers and then everyone could choose whatever provider they want to pay for

Re: WhatsApp introduces ads in its app

#743

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Sure, Matrix is a thing, but every time I look at it, all I see is criticism of its specifications and poor interoperability between implementations? Not sure what you're talking about. Everything is working fine for me, and they even conduct a whole conference about it annually: https://2024.matrix.org/ With a large number of clients and servers and the lack of a walled garden (like with Signal), you will always f…

Matrix is crap. If you want a serious alternative use XMPP with OMEMO or just use Email.

Care to elaborate on why you think it's crap, instead of just shitting on it? The latter is not terribly helpful to the discussion.

Re: WhatsApp introduces ads in its app

#744
Anyone remembers time when WhatsApp was a paid app on the AppStore? I miss that monetisation strategy, paying for an app once and calling it a day.

Everything seems to have either adds or subscription modes now, from Sudoku apps to flight tracking (yes Flighty, talking about you).

Re: WhatsApp introduces ads in its app

#745
post #605

Can we get a federated messenger already? Sure, we have email, but the MS/Google duopoloy has effectively unfederated that, with their inscrutable block lists and nonexistent appeals processes, allegedly in order to protect you from spam. Sure, XMPP is a thing, which has been mostly dead for well over a decade. Sure, Matrix is a thing, but every time I look at it, all I see is criticism of its specifications and poor…

What about SMS?

Re: WhatsApp introduces ads in its app

#746

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is becoming painfully apparent that the cycle of enshittification is truly inevitable, right up there next to the second law of thermodynamics.

Unless it's an open, federated system.

Right. Instant messaging should be considered basic / core utility like ISPs. I can pay a cheap or even a free one and they'll probably sell my data or I can pay more for an ISP that preserve my privacy

Re: WhatsApp introduces ads in its app

#747
post #605

Can we get a federated messenger already? Sure, we have email, but the MS/Google duopoloy has effectively unfederated that, with their inscrutable block lists and nonexistent appeals processes, allegedly in order to protect you from spam. Sure, XMPP is a thing, which has been mostly dead for well over a decade. Sure, Matrix is a thing, but every time I look at it, all I see is criticism of its specifications and poor…

I tell people to email me and for the spastics that can't handle that I have jmp.chat set up so they can send SMS/MMS to my email.

Re: WhatsApp introduces ads in its app

#748
post #658

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's been 11 years. If they hadn't been bought they'd have found a different monetization model long ago

WhatsApp make billions of dollars but Meta wants it to make hundreds of billions. There's no way to appease the dragon.

Curious how whatsapp makes any money besides the handful of companies that use it as a customer support portal

Re: WhatsApp introduces ads in its app

#749

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> most people won't switch because of network effects, so meta can keep tightening the screws Network effects are much much smaller for messaging apps vis-a-vis social networks because there is no problem in incrementally moving your DMs from one place to another.

There is a massive barrier to switching. In order to switch, you also need to convince your acquaintances to switch. Good luck with that.

This needs a regulatory involvement (for federation)

Re: WhatsApp introduces ads in its app

#750

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's amazing, I'm still trying to move our family group chat to Signal... I've moved exact zero family members.

Are you still on WhatsApp? If yes, then that's the reason. Trying to move a whole group over when you're willing to compromise is a recipe for failure because everybody would get inconvenienced for something that's only somewhat important to you. It's like: should we all go to a vegan restaurant instead of the usual steakhouse because you decided you want to "try" being vegan this Friday night, of all nights. Just tr…

> Are you still on WhatsApp?

That would actually be marginally better. No everyone is on f-ing Snapchat. I'm in Denmark, which like the US is pretty big on iMessage, so originally we where using that. Then my sister got an Android phone, and the group chat obviously broken, because no RCS back then.

Everyone has SMS, Snapchat, Facebook Messenger and Instagram (except me for Meta products). So no one is really keen on adding a fifth app, where for me it would remove Snapchat, bringing me down to just SMS and Signal.

Post reply on HN