Earlier quoted context omitted.
Australian? We're one of only a few countries[1] who call the game Chinese Whispers. 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_game
Not the OP, but FWIW I'm British and we also called it that in the late 80s.
WhatsApp introduces ads in its app
741–750 of 1001 posts
Re: WhatsApp introduces ads in its app
#742Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Seem to remember paying for WhatsApp when I first downloaded it. I’d be happy to keep paying. Just not the amount that they can make from advertising. Solution maybe to ban intrusive advertising so they can’t make a lot of money from it that way?
The problem is the fragmentation. We need federation first across all providers and then everyone could choose whatever provider they want to pay for
Re: WhatsApp introduces ads in its app
#743Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Sure, Matrix is a thing, but every time I look at it, all I see is criticism of its specifications and poor interoperability between implementations? Not sure what you're talking about. Everything is working fine for me, and they even conduct a whole conference about it annually: https://2024.matrix.org/ With a large number of clients and servers and the lack of a walled garden (like with Signal), you will always f…
Matrix is crap. If you want a serious alternative use XMPP with OMEMO or just use Email.
Re: WhatsApp introduces ads in its app
#744Everything seems to have either adds or subscription modes now, from Sudoku apps to flight tracking (yes Flighty, talking about you).
Re: WhatsApp introduces ads in its app
#745Can we get a federated messenger already? Sure, we have email, but the MS/Google duopoloy has effectively unfederated that, with their inscrutable block lists and nonexistent appeals processes, allegedly in order to protect you from spam. Sure, XMPP is a thing, which has been mostly dead for well over a decade. Sure, Matrix is a thing, but every time I look at it, all I see is criticism of its specifications and poor…
Re: WhatsApp introduces ads in its app
#746Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is becoming painfully apparent that the cycle of enshittification is truly inevitable, right up there next to the second law of thermodynamics.
Unless it's an open, federated system.
Re: WhatsApp introduces ads in its app
#747Can we get a federated messenger already? Sure, we have email, but the MS/Google duopoloy has effectively unfederated that, with their inscrutable block lists and nonexistent appeals processes, allegedly in order to protect you from spam. Sure, XMPP is a thing, which has been mostly dead for well over a decade. Sure, Matrix is a thing, but every time I look at it, all I see is criticism of its specifications and poor…
Re: WhatsApp introduces ads in its app
#748Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's been 11 years. If they hadn't been bought they'd have found a different monetization model long ago
WhatsApp make billions of dollars but Meta wants it to make hundreds of billions. There's no way to appease the dragon.
Re: WhatsApp introduces ads in its app
#749Earlier quoted context omitted.
> most people won't switch because of network effects, so meta can keep tightening the screws Network effects are much much smaller for messaging apps vis-a-vis social networks because there is no problem in incrementally moving your DMs from one place to another.
There is a massive barrier to switching. In order to switch, you also need to convince your acquaintances to switch. Good luck with that.
Re: WhatsApp introduces ads in its app
#750Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's amazing, I'm still trying to move our family group chat to Signal... I've moved exact zero family members.
Are you still on WhatsApp? If yes, then that's the reason. Trying to move a whole group over when you're willing to compromise is a recipe for failure because everybody would get inconvenienced for something that's only somewhat important to you. It's like: should we all go to a vegan restaurant instead of the usual steakhouse because you decided you want to "try" being vegan this Friday night, of all nights. Just tr…
That would actually be marginally better. No everyone is on f-ing Snapchat. I'm in Denmark, which like the US is pretty big on iMessage, so originally we where using that. Then my sister got an Android phone, and the group chat obviously broken, because no RCS back then.
Everyone has SMS, Snapchat, Facebook Messenger and Instagram (except me for Meta products). So no one is really keen on adding a fifth app, where for me it would remove Snapchat, bringing me down to just SMS and Signal.