Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub

bloomberg.com

741–750 of 1001 posts

Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub

#741
post #307

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Maybe this event will finally shift things back into a decentralized direction. People say this every time stuff like this happens, and yet people never learn :/.

> Talks about a decentralized environment Keeps his tools related to Cydia closed-source...

What's the story with that?

Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub

#742
post #731

GitHub is a venture backed company with some $350M raised according to Crunchbase[1]. As such, your options are pretty much limited to IPO, being acquired, generating crazy profits and buying out investors to stay private, or go bankrupt. Since it appears they had hard time turning profitable[2], I’m hardly surprised that GH May be ending the way of Microsoft. I think it’s worthwile question to everyone who is lament…

> I urge all the ‘let’s move to GItLab or other’ people give that a hard thought and how that will eventually expire.

Either they eventually fail/become evil, or they don't. If they do, just move somewhere else. If they don't, good.

(Benefits of non-proprietary software and standards like git.)

Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub

#743
post #728

Just like how no e-commerce/retailer wants to use AWS for competitive reasons, now no tech company who hosts its codebase on GitHub would want to continue doing that if its MSFT-owned. It's already happening: https://twitter.com/nixcraft/status/1003388106626629632

> Just like how no e-commerce/retailer wants to use AWS for competitive reason My former employer, a major e-commerce player in Europe and a direct competitor of Amazon, had basically their entire infrastucture on AWS. You might want to reconsider your definition of “no”.

Just because someone did it, it doesn’t mean it’s wise and advisable. Just saying.

Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub

#745

This may just be paranoia but if I were competing with Microsoft on something that I'd have private code for hosted on GitHub, I'd be pretty worried right now.

Microsoft doesn't have the time or resources to give a fuck about yours or other's shitty private repos. Besides, if they really wanted to compete, they would just utilise their massive engineering team to extinguish the competition.

Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub

#746
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

MS has had an 180 degree turn in policy since Balmer left. Lately they released amazing open-source projects with VSCode being the most prominent one.

Honest question: do the still threaten Linux-related companies with suing for violations of unspecified Microsoft patents?

Last time I've heard, MS is still shaking down many mobile manufactures who use Android, using patent protection racket.

Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub

#747

I think a couple of people will change to gitlab or alternatives because of how Microsoft was in the 90's. But that Microsoft has changed, I see the most what people are complaining about is telemetry that is send, for following up on their biggest product. But all companies do this ( eg. https://techcrunch.com/2016/03/28/its-not-just-you-clicking-... ), also open source applications eg. Ubuntu,.. do this. Microsoft…

> I think a couple of people will change to gitlab or alternatives because of how Microsoft was in the 90's. And because of how Microsoft was in the 2000s, and the 2010s. Ballmer was after the 90s. Did they ever stop suing Android manufacturers for using FAT, or open up exFAT after managing to get it as part of the SDXC standard? > also open source applications eg. Ubuntu,.. do this ...Yeah, Ubuntu did that. Not Debi…

[deleted]

Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub

#748
post #176

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If it’s any consolation, Apple Music is terrible on iOS and MacOS as well.

True, but Windows users would find it odd if an app didn't suck. It has to match the overall Windows experience. Note: I'm working on making Chef code work for Windows deployments of an application that runs under Node. I have strong opinions on Windows right now.

What. Windows apps are far from sucking. There is still no OSS match for Windows Explorer.

Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub

#749

I think a couple of people will change to gitlab or alternatives because of how Microsoft was in the 90's. But that Microsoft has changed, I see the most what people are complaining about is telemetry that is send, for following up on their biggest product. But all companies do this ( eg. https://techcrunch.com/2016/03/28/its-not-just-you-clicking-... ), also open source applications eg. Ubuntu,.. do this. Microsoft…

> Microsoft has changed

Changed? What makes you say that?

From the tiny interaction I have with MS I don’t think this is the case.

E.g. In my wife’s PC I have Firefox as the default browser, however:

1. If she clicks on one of the login manager wallpaper photos, the page opens in MS Edge.

2. Every time there is an update, MS Edge reappears as an icon on the desktop.

No, MS hasn’t changed. Their PR may have, but at core they are as evil as ever.

Re: Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub

#750
post #721

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I hope they don't discontinue Atom Hadn't crossed my mind that they might drop Atom for VS Code before...

Atom is open source though. One company can not decide to kill it. https://github.com/atom/atom

In my experience, open source projects that are primarily backed by companies fail to create a real community of developers. Therefore when the company dies, development stalls.

RethinkDB was something that I though would still go strong without the backing. I never used it and was never involved, so I'd love to hear what happened when the company died.

(One exemption is Xfree86 though, which was forked successfully by to community to Xorg if I recall correctly)

Post reply on HN