US plans online portal to bypass content bans in Europe and elsewhere
731–740 of 1001 posts
Re: US plans online portal to bypass content bans in Europe and elsewhere
#732Re: US plans online portal to bypass content bans in Europe and elsewhere
#733Earlier quoted context omitted.
Narrative is controlled by censorship.
This was the old world. In our world narrative control is not by restrictions, but by abundance. Flood the zone writ large.
Re: US plans online portal to bypass content bans in Europe and elsewhere
#734Earlier quoted context omitted.
Freedom of speech is not absolute anywhere, not even under the 1st amendment in the USA. Death threats are illegal whether they happen offline or online. Yelling "I HAVE A BOMB!" in an airport comes with consequences. I believe we can agree on these two examples.
Yes, we can. But that's not what "hate speech" is code word for. At this point in time any opinion to the right of extreme leftist ideology is considered by said leftist to be "hate speech". Examples of "hate speech": criticism of muslims (but jews are ok), or minorities, or men playing in women's sport or breast amputation of 15yr olds, or immigration. Nick investigating Somali fraud is racist and hateful. The "hate…
Re: US plans online portal to bypass content bans in Europe and elsewhere
#735Earlier quoted context omitted.
This definition is so broad it basically encompasses all communication.
I mean, in a way, all communication is propaganda. Its one person or group trying to influence you with their information.
Preventing non-ideal outcomes is not about lying, but not doing things you might regret in the future.
This is why I'm no politician, though.
Re: US plans online portal to bypass content bans in Europe and elsewhere
#736Earlier quoted context omitted.
As someone living in an EU state who has to regularly turn my VPN on and off to have full internet access, I can't agree with you that it's a "hoax". It's inconvenient enough for me that I'm looking into having a custom router that will switch between VPN destinations depending on what site I'm accessing. Also "EU countries have higher press freedom than the US" is a strawman argument. We're not talking about press f…
What content are you missing? Off the top of my head, the type of content most likely to ve missing in Europe would be: - geofenced media - commercial sites intentionally removing eu access because of gdpr. That's it. Those are the only cases where I could not access sites from tbe EU. At least the ones I encountered. And do notice, both of them are not filtered by the EU or anything like this. They are enforced at t…
Re: US plans online portal to bypass content bans in Europe and elsewhere
#737Earlier quoted context omitted.
According to Reuters, it will essentially be a free VPN. https://www.reuters.com/world/us-plans-online-portal-bypass-...
So you're not paying for it? In corporate america how is that going to be moneytized?
Re: US plans online portal to bypass content bans in Europe and elsewhere
#738Earlier quoted context omitted.
Narrative is controlled by censorship.
And/or propaganda. Everyone can feel censorship, everyone can learn what they're punished for saying. Propaganda, though, that can feel like learning, like personal growth and development. If censorship comes with a stick, propaganda is a carrot. And today, we have as much of a problem with metaphorical obesity as with literal obesity.
Re: US plans online portal to bypass content bans in Europe and elsewhere
#739Earlier quoted context omitted.
> very explicitly stated goals of sowing discord within the US's former "allies", to weaken Europe, and to promote racist and fringe-right views. The US government explicitly said that they seek to promote racist and fringe-right views? Do you have any sort of evidence to back it up?
Trump's Truth Social feed? The Vice President spreading racist lies about Hatians eating neighbor's pets on national television?
Re: US plans online portal to bypass content bans in Europe and elsewhere
#740Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's why diversity of sources is the only way to escape censorship: you get one half truth from one source, another half truth from another source, then two halves make whole truth.
This assumes you have the cognitive resources to do that. Most people just switch to someone they trust to avoid exactly this. Matter of fact, that was the major advantage of the net back in the day.