[flagged]
We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42306816.
731–739 of 739 posts
[flagged]
We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42306816.
I love how Hacker News moderators will let international political news stay on the site. But never any US political news stay on. Unless it serves the tech industry.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sure. One example is when you have inferior force. You cant force someone to do something with threats, but you can pay them to do something. Another example is when the cost of violence is high. If have two people with guns, or MAD scenarios, violence isnt an effective way to get what you want, so payment can be better. The last example and simplest is if you need a service and the other party simply chooses destruc…
These are all interesting examples, but they support the point rather than deny it. If you have an inferior force, usually you get invaded (see Ukraine). Even paying can still be done to support your opposition until they control the government (see banana republics). Either way, you no longer hold the monopoly on violence, somebody else does. Guns and MAD are exactly the kind of violence society is founded upon. Ult…
People with inferior violence and still have powers available.
This is obvious because two people can still conduct business even if they have guns pointed at each other's head. Two people can conduct business if neither of them have guns and a third party is a gun at both of their heads.
This means that there are powers beyond violence that can be used to influence others.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It is odd however that the U.S. government escalates in Ukraine, there is a new color revolution in Georgia (the country adjacent to Russia), the Syrian rebels launch a major attack and now this. All of this "coincidentally" makes Trump's peace efforts more difficult. Escalating in Ukraine (against Russia), launching a major attack against Assad (a Russian ally) and an upcoming revolution against an (allegedly) pro…
Launching a major attack against Assad (a Russian ally) and an upcoming revolution against an (allegedly) pro-Russian government in Georgia all seem to fit into a pattern. The only "pattern" between these two at least -- is that you haven't cited any direct, observable reason to believe that US agencies have been behind these events. You know, "evidence" and all that. But rather simply -- speculation.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Launching a major attack against Assad (a Russian ally) and an upcoming revolution against an (allegedly) pro-Russian government in Georgia all seem to fit into a pattern. The only "pattern" between these two at least -- is that you haven't cited any direct, observable reason to believe that US agencies have been behind these events. You know, "evidence" and all that. But rather simply -- speculation.
You know, the idea of so called coups, revolutions and so on is that they should be impossible to tie to foreign agencies, at least for the first couple of months. Ex. Iran-1953, Chile-1973, etc.
The world has changed a lot in the last 50 years, you know.
Especially in terms of the ability of countries/agencies to keep pretty much anything of this nature secret for more than 15 minutes.
I love how Hacker News moderators will let international political news stay on the site. But never any US political news stay on. Unless it serves the tech industry.
A few weeks ago, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42057647 was the largest thread in HN's history. More than twice the size of the previous largest thread, in fact.
The linked thread is also very highly ratioed, with a 5.36:1 comments:votes ratio, which is also pretty high on the flamewar / spiciness scale. (I'll have to check my own front-page archive for any higher comment:vote ratios.)
The highest voted post remains Stephen Hawking's obituary:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16582136>
Searching "comments>3000" provides the following list of 8 submissions, which I've sorted and reformatted:
9282 comments 1796 points 1 month ago Trump wins presidency for second time
4576 comments 3089 points 4 years ago Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided U.S.
3859 comments 4489 points 5 months ago CrowdStrike Update: Windows Bluescreen and Boot Loops
3676 comments 1058 points 4 years ago Amazon, Apple and Google Cut Off Parler
3676 comments 2498 points 3 years ago Twitter set to accept Musk's $43B offer – sources
3463 comments 1765 points 2 years ago Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade
3078 comments 2747 points 3 years ago Elon Musk makes $43B unsolicited bid to take Twitter private
3065 comments 1183 points 4 years ago YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread election fraud
Difference in ratios of the first and second items is notable.Earlier quoted context omitted.
You know, the idea of so called coups, revolutions and so on is that they should be impossible to tie to foreign agencies, at least for the first couple of months. Ex. Iran-1953, Chile-1973, etc.
And that's the "evidence", is what you're saying? The world has changed a lot in the last 50 years, you know. Especially in terms of the ability of countries/agencies to keep pretty much anything of this nature secret for more than 15 minutes.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
And that's the "evidence", is what you're saying? The world has changed a lot in the last 50 years, you know. Especially in terms of the ability of countries/agencies to keep pretty much anything of this nature secret for more than 15 minutes.
CIA involvement in both cases was proved with documents only recently, after declassification of documents.
Even so - actually it's a myth that most of these coups were even "secret" at time. By and large, the people actually living in these countries knew what as up. The Arbenz coup in 1954, for example (not on your list, but a canonical example of this "pattern") was exposed right away, and the US got a lot of flack for it internationally.
Anyway, it's not like I'm asking hard "proof" and the full operational details. Just, you know, some objective indication that there's something going on along the lines of what you're alluding to.
Which these days would be nearly impossible to hide for any length of time.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
And that's the "evidence", is what you're saying? The world has changed a lot in the last 50 years, you know. Especially in terms of the ability of countries/agencies to keep pretty much anything of this nature secret for more than 15 minutes.
CIA involvement in both cases was proved with documents only recently, after declassification of documents.