Earlier quoted context omitted.
My suspicion is that since a lot of internal comms runs through the FB domain and since everyone is still WFH, then its probably a massive issue just to get people talking to each other to solve the problem.
You mean the same problem as when GMail goes down and Googlers can't reach each other? I guess good decentralized public communication services could solve those issues for everybody.
Facebook-owned sites were down
731–740 of 1001 posts
Re: Facebook-owned sites were down
#732Reddit r/Sysadmin user that claims to be on the "Recovery Team" for this ongoing issue: > As many of you know, DNS for FB services has been affected and this is likely a symptom of the actual issue, and that's that BGP peering with Facebook peering routers has gone down, very likely due to a configuration change that went into effect shortly before the outages happened (started roughly 1540 UTC). There are people now…
Archived version: https://archive.is/QvdmH
Re: Facebook-owned sites were down
#733Earlier quoted context omitted.
And there his account went poof, thanks for archiving.
They were quoted on multiple news sites including Ars Technica. I would imagine they were not authorized to post that information. I hope they don't lose their job. Shareholders and other business leaders I'm sure are much happier reporting this as a series of unfortunate technical failures (which I'm sure is part of it) rather than a company-wide organizational failure. The fact they can't physically badge in the pe…
Operations teams normally have a special room with a secure connection for situations like this, so that production can be controlled in the event of bgp failure, nuclear war, etc. I could see physical presence being an issue if their bgp router depends on something like a crypto module in a locked cage, in which case there's always helicopters.
So if anything, Facebook's labor policies are about to become cooler.
Re: Facebook-owned sites were down
#734Re: Facebook-owned sites were down
#735Ironic enough; status.fb.com also down.
Re: Facebook-owned sites were down
#736Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seriously? Is that how it works?
No, the backbone of the internet is not maintained with patches sent in emails.
Re: Facebook-owned sites were down
#737Re: Facebook-owned sites were down
#738Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seriously? Is that how it works?
No, the backbone of the internet is not maintained with patches sent in emails.
Re: Facebook-owned sites were down
#739In the post-mortem, we'll find out that Facebook's alerting and comms systems all run on Facebook. As a result, they can't even coordinate the restart to roll back changes.
Re: Facebook-owned sites were down
#740Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seriously? Is that how it works?
No, the backbone of the internet is not maintained with patches sent in emails.