GPT-5.4
721–730 of 868 posts
Re: GPT-5.4
#722Re: GPT-5.4
#723Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's more hedonic adaptation, people just aren't as impressed by incremental changes anymore over big leaps. It's the same as another thread yesterday where someone said the new MacBook with the latest processor doesn't excite them anymore, and it's because for most people, most models are good enough and now it's all about applications. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47232453#47232735
Plus people just really like to whine on the internet
Re: GPT-5.4
#724Earlier quoted context omitted.
But, why include the non-functional chat box in the article?
Different team "manages" the overall blog than the team who wrote that specific article. At one point, maybe it made sense, then something in the product changed, team that manages the blog never tested it again. Or, people just stopped thinking about any sort of UX. These sort of mistakes are all over the place, on literally all web properties, some UX flows just ends with you at a page where nothing works sometimes…
They can use this new tech called AI to test it.
Re: GPT-5.4
#725Re: GPT-5.4
#726I just tried that in Codex CLI. With /fast mode enabled. Observations: 1. Fast mode ain't that fast 2. Large context * Fast * Higher Model Base Price = 8x increase over gpt-5.3-codex 3. I burnt 33% of my 5h limit (ChatGPT Business Subscription) with a prompt that took 2 minutes to complete.
How do you arrive at that number? I find it hard to make sense of this ad hoc, given that the total token cost is not very interesting; it's token efficiency we care about.
Re: GPT-5.4
#727Re: GPT-5.4
#728I just tried that in Codex CLI. With /fast mode enabled. Observations: 1. Fast mode ain't that fast 2. Large context * Fast * Higher Model Base Price = 8x increase over gpt-5.3-codex 3. I burnt 33% of my 5h limit (ChatGPT Business Subscription) with a prompt that took 2 minutes to complete.
2. no if you are on subscription, it's the same, at 20$ codex 5.4 xhigh provide way more than 20$ opus thinking ( this one instead really can burn 33% with 1 request, try to compare then on same tasks ) also 8x .. ??? if you need 1M token for a special tasks doesn't hit /fast and vice-versa , the higher price doesn't apply on subscription too..
3. false, i'm on pro , so 10x the base , always on /fast (no 1M), and often 2 parallel instances working.. hardly can use 2% (=20% of 5h limit , in 1h of work ( about 15/20 req/hour) ) , claude is way worse on that imo
Re: GPT-5.4
#729I just tried that in Codex CLI. With /fast mode enabled. Observations: 1. Fast mode ain't that fast 2. Large context * Fast * Higher Model Base Price = 8x increase over gpt-5.3-codex 3. I burnt 33% of my 5h limit (ChatGPT Business Subscription) with a prompt that took 2 minutes to complete.
1. it's 1.5x , it's quite fast for the level of thinking it has 2. no if you are on subscription, it's the same, at 20$ codex 5.4 xhigh provide way more than 20$ opus thinking ( this one instead really can burn 33% with 1 request, try to compare then on same tasks ) also 8x .. ??? if you need 1M token for a special tasks doesn't hit /fast and vice-versa , the higher price doesn't apply on subscription too.. 3. false,…
Re: GPT-5.4
#730I find it quite funny how this blog post has a big "Ask ChatGPT" box at the bottom. So you might think you could ask a question about the contents of the blog post, so you type the text "summarise this blog post". And it opens a new chat window with the link to the blog post followed by "summarise this blog post". Only to be told "I can't access external URLs directly, but if you can paste the relevant text or descri…
They barely test this stuff.