Live data from Hacker News

Mozilla to shut down Pocket and Fakespot

support.mozilla.org

721–730 of 782 posts

Re: Mozilla to shut down Pocket and Fakespot

#721

I loved Pocket. I used it nearly daily. I was often in their top n% of users. I paid for it. Then one day they changed the way their rendering worked on iOS. And it destroyed my workflow. I also bought a Kobo E-Reader specifically to use Pocket with it. In short order I found an open-source alternative - Omnivore - and spent my time hacking away at my Kobo to get it to pull from there instead. https://github.com/Podg…

Check the barebones but functional Wallabag. Hosted version available for a fee.

Related bit from my other comment:

> If you don't want to bother with self-hosting, there are some hosted options available: https://github.com/wallabag/wallabag/wiki/wallabag-ecosystem...

Re: Mozilla to shut down Pocket and Fakespot

#723
post #80

I have used Wallabag[0] for read-later articles for many years. Very happy about it. I host it on a VPS but they offer a paid instance[1] themselves for $9/y. And otherwise you can use something like Pikapods[2] which is also dirt cheap. [0] https://github.com/wallabag/wallabag [1] https://www.wallabag.it/en [2] https://www.pikapods.com/apps

Related bit from my other comment:

> If you don't want to bother with self-hosting, there are some hosted options available: https://github.com/wallabag/wallabag/wiki/wallabag-ecosystem...

Re: Mozilla to shut down Pocket and Fakespot

#724

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The initial idea was nice: do not lose what you want to read later (the list), keep a list of what you read (archive). Then it became better with “Permanent copies”: never lose content you want to read again later. That number is a combination of all three, plus more than a decade of active use.

Damn, any alternatives in mind for that workflow? My killer feature that led me to start using Pocket was Kobo integration: I could hit a button on my computer and continue reading an article on my ereader, duly cleaned up.

[dead]

Re: Mozilla to shut down Pocket and Fakespot

#725

So much wasted potential, I was a top 1% reader for a couple years (mostly because I saved a lot of things probably); it was a convenient way to save articles and references in multiple devices but at the end I was frustated it was so cumberstone to keep links organized. I stopped paying premium and migrated to a self-hosted Wallabag, which doesn't have all the features I want but hey, in hindsight it was the right d…

Pocket has 85 public repositotories. If it's possible to host the entire thing, I bet it isn't simple. https://github.com/Pocket/

Re: Mozilla to shut down Pocket and Fakespot

#727

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sorry, but I'm not going to trust any browser based on Chrome. Even Brave. It's not long until Brave won't be able to support Manifest V2 as Google has every interest to kill it completely.

> It's not long until Brave won't be able to support Manifest V2 That's true but not that big of a deal in their case. The built-in ad blocker works quite well and removes the need to run uBlock Origin.

Brave's adblocker won't do anything against Google's trackers if Google builds it in to the engine.

Again, I advise against trusting anything Chromium-based.

Also, you apparently haven't heard of uBlock Origin's Medium Mode. Brave can't even touch that. There's more than just advertising to worry about on the web.

Re: Mozilla to shut down Pocket and Fakespot

#728
post #696
post #694

Never heard of Fakespot, but Pocket is a loss. I don't use it as much anymore, but it was a very convenient way to keep my reading queue. I mean, honestly, it didn't really solve the problem for me completely, because I saved way more that I read, but at some point I relied on it heavily.

Fakespot is great. Basically tells you how many customer reviews are real vs bots. Helps with amazon purchases determining what is counterfeit vs real product

I've always been suspicious about how many brand-name products that I wouldn't give a second thought about in a store were marked as D or F.

Re: Mozilla to shut down Pocket and Fakespot

#729

Another feature no one asked for, meeting its technological grave. For those few users of Pocket this function could have been easily handled as an extension. If Mozilla spent the engineering hours wasted on this toward fixing the ever growing mountain of existing bugs they might have more than 1% market share.

Firefox has the "killer app" for modern browsers--ublock origin. I am dismayed by how much money Mozilla spends on things other than the browser, though.

Except for the vast majority of normal people, uBlock Origin Lite is enough. And Blink alternatives like Brave or Vivaldi have them built-in while using the "preferred" engine, which is even more convient.

So, to them, Firefox is a worse performing browser with missing features that sometimes doesn't work for certain websites. There's no "killer app" to be seen.

Re: Mozilla to shut down Pocket and Fakespot

#730
post #657
post #650

Hard to say if I cared a wit for pocket, but fakespot was useful.

I had no confidence in fakespot's ratings.

I can see why it needs to be shut down: I think that Amazon has almost certainly worked to limit the usability and usefulness of such an app.

Plus, sellers have more tools than ever at their disposal to generate "real" reviews, including plain and simple bribes to real customers to make them, completely unenforceable by Amazon.

Post reply on HN