Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Claude Opus 4.6

anthropic.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

711–720 of 1001 posts

Re: Claude Opus 4.6

#712

Post by jama211 »

blibble wrote: post #83
jama211 wrote: post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s extremely successful, not sure what it explains other than your biases

Microsoft's products are also extremely successful they're also total garbage

Well there you have it, proof you’re not being reasonable. Microsoft’s products annoy HN users but they are absolutely not total garbage. They’re highly functional and valuable and if they weren’t they truely wouldn’t be used, they’re just flawed.

Re: Claude Opus 4.6

#713

Post by jama211 »

wavemode wrote: post #411
holoduke wrote: post #391

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Claude is by far the most popular and best assistant currently available for a developer.

Okay, and Windows is by far the most popular desktop operating system. Discussions are pointless when the parties are talking past each other.

Yes, and windows is pretty good for most people. Don’t be ridiculous.

Re: Claude Opus 4.6

#714

Post by jama211 »

everforward wrote: post #588
jama211 wrote: post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There’s nothing wrong with that, except it lets ai skeptics feel superior

There are absolutely things wrong with that, because React was designed to solve problems that don't exist in a TUI. React fixes issues with the DOM being too slow to fully re-render the entire webpage every time a piece of state changes. That doesn't apply in a TUI, you can re-render TUIs faster than the monitor can refresh. There's no need to selectively re-render parts of the UI, you can just re-render the entire…

It is demonstrably absolutely fine. Sheesh.

Re: Claude Opus 4.6

#715

Post by jama211 »

overgard wrote: post #490
jama211 wrote: post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There’s nothing wrong with that, except it lets ai skeptics feel superior

I haven't looked at it directly, so I can speak on quality, but it's a pretty weird way to write a terminal app

It’s unusual but it’s a better fit for agentic coding so it makes sense

Re: Claude Opus 4.6

#716

Post by jama211 »

3836293648 wrote: post #243
jama211 wrote: post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There’s nothing wrong with that, except it lets ai skeptics feel superior

Oh come on. It's massively wrong. It is always wrong. It's not always wrong enough to be important, but it doesn't stop being wrong

No, it’s not.

Re: Claude Opus 4.6

#719

Post by jama211 »

krona wrote: post #127
gjsman-1000 wrote: post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also explains why Claude Code is a React app outputting to a Terminal. (Seriously.)

Sounds like a web developer defined the solution a year before they knew what the problem was.

Nah. It’s just web development languages are a better fit for agentic coding presently. They weighed the pros and cons, they’re not stupid.

Re: Claude Opus 4.6

#720

Post by kuboble »

altern8 wrote: post #628
kuboble wrote: post #509

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Claude code (opus) is very good in Polish. I sometimes vibe code in polish and it's as good as with English for me. It speaks a natural, native level Polish. I used opus to translate thousands of strings in my app into polish, Korean, and two Chinese dialects. Polish one is great, and the other are also good according to my customers.

Your game is amazing! I wish there was a "Reset" button to go back to the original position. Where are you in Poland?

Thanks :) Click "Level" -> "Try again"

Originally from Wrocław, but don't live in Poland anymore

Post reply on HN