Live data from Hacker News

ABC yanks Jimmy Kimmel’s show ‘indefinitely’ after threat from FCC chair

cnn.com

711–720 of 1001 posts

Re: ABC yanks Jimmy Kimmel’s show ‘indefinitely’ after threat from FCC chair

#711

[flagged]

In death, Mr. Kirk has become more useful than he was in life. There’s so much more coverage of him compared to, say, routine Russian drone incursions over NATO states. And I haven’t heard anyone actually quote him; not a word of his supposed wisdom. But, this occasion gets to be scribbled into the blank for “________ takes down that Jimmy Kimmel”.

Re: ABC yanks Jimmy Kimmel’s show ‘indefinitely’ after threat from FCC chair

#712
post #608

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Probably penalized due to political themes being discouraged on HN. Which is IMO a bad decision. You can ignore politics, but politics won't ignore you.

Kirk's murder itself made the front page ... so we clearly don't always ignore politically adjacent topics here

We're apolitical when it: A) doesn't matter, or B) it serves the interest of the tech bro hustle culture. We're political when: it serves the tech bro hustle culture

Re: ABC yanks Jimmy Kimmel’s show ‘indefinitely’ after threat from FCC chair

#713
post #695

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> However, clearly some people did. Freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom from consequences. In this case, his employer responded to partner backlash over his remarks. Government officials also threatened to pull the government provided broadcasting licenses that the corporation has. That’s free speech related.

Ok. I missed that detail.

>During a Wednesday podcast appearance, FCC head Brendan Carr threatened to revoke the broadcasting licenses of any stations that continued to air Kimmel’s content.

>“It’s time for them to step and say this garbage…isn’t something that we think serves the needs of our local communities,” he said.

>Carr’s threat should have been toothless. The FCC is prohibited by law from employing “the power of censorship” or interfering “with the right of free speech.” There is a very narrow and rarely used exception for “news distortion,” in which a broadcast news outlet knowingly airs false reports. What Kimmel did — an offhand comment based on weak evidence — is extremely different from creating a news report with the intent to deceive.

>Hours after Carr’s Wednesday threat, Nexstar — the largest owner of local stations in America — suddenly decided that Kimmel’s comments from two nights ago were unacceptable. Nexstar, it should be noted, is currently attempting to purchase one of its major rivals for $6.2 billion — a merger that would require express FCC approval.

Source: https://www.vox.com/politics/461887/jimmy-kimmel-suspension-...

Re: ABC yanks Jimmy Kimmel’s show ‘indefinitely’ after threat from FCC chair

#714

[flagged]

This is a false equivalency, unfortunately. We can discuss all we like about cancel-culture-on-the-left, but it misses the glaring difference:

The left used their speech to encourage consequences for those whose speech they didn’t like.

The right is now using the power of the government to silence speech they don’t like.

That is a massive and important difference, and it is blindingly obvious.

Re: ABC yanks Jimmy Kimmel’s show ‘indefinitely’ after threat from FCC chair

#716

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also, there is quite a bit of money on the line, you can't really blame ABC for acting as a corporation: https://latenighter.com/news/jimmy-kimmels-removal-comes-ami...

Actually. You can. Money isn't an excuse to do whatever you want

The incentive for a corporation leans heavily into making deals worth billions of dollars, which is also happening here.

A change of status quo in this case, will require massive loss of Disney+ subscriptions, which is not that probable.

Re: ABC yanks Jimmy Kimmel’s show ‘indefinitely’ after threat from FCC chair

#718

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why is this the turning point and not, say, the attempts (and successful assassination of one) on Minnesota lawmakers a few months ago?

Just a guess, but in that case, very few people really knew who those lawmakers were, and there wasn't camera footage of the murder in that case to be spread virally on social media.

A lot of the media coverage this week begins with an introduction to Mr. Kirk. Do you think he was a household name?

Re: ABC yanks Jimmy Kimmel’s show ‘indefinitely’ after threat from FCC chair

#719

It really is kind of incredible. I just saw the clip and there really is absolutely nothing there. This is not even 10% as poignant of what Jon Stewart would say in his day. He doesn't even say anything about Kirk himself, or even about the murder—he just talks about the reaction to it. I already thought it was very suspicious that Sinclair's official press release just talks about how the remarks were "inappropriate…

Its a Reichstag fire/Horst Wessel moment all rolled into one. Right out of the play book.

Re: ABC yanks Jimmy Kimmel’s show ‘indefinitely’ after threat from FCC chair

#720
post #583

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We had all the info yesterday, kid was a terminally online groyper. If "the left" can do nothing and still be blamed for everything, what exactly is the way forward?

One way forward is to stop all this ridiculous left/right dichotomy. It looks like the fascists have taken over the USA, so there's only Trump-adorers and everyone else. There's actual masked men rounding up people of colour on the streets, so it's not like the fascism can even be denied.

That's the answer, but the question was rhetorical for the person I was replying to. The outgroup is getting larger, yet people are failing to acknowledge that all the accusations at this point are just bad faith, surface level excuses for said fascism.
Post reply on HN