Live data from Hacker News

“They introduce kernel bugs on purpose”

lore.kernel.org

711–720 of 1001 posts

Re: “They introduce kernel bugs on purpose”

#711

This seems like a pretty scummy way to do "research". I mean I understand that people in academia are becoming increasingly disconnected from the real world, but wow this is low. It's not that they're doing this, I'm sure they're not the first to think of this (for research or malicious reasons), but having the gall to brag about it is a new low.

There is no separate real world distinct from academia. Saying that scientists and researchers whose job it is to understand and improve the world are somehow becoming "increasingly disconnected from the real world" is a pretty cheap shot. Especially without any proof or even a suggestion of how you would quantify that.

Re: “They introduce kernel bugs on purpose”

#712
I have to wonder what's going to happen to the advisor who oversaw this research. This knee-caps the whole department when conducting OS research and collaboration. If this isn't considered a big deal in the department, it should be. I certainly wouldn't pursue a graduate degree there in OS research now.

Re: “They introduce kernel bugs on purpose”

#713
As a user of linux, I want to see this ban go further. Nothing from the University of MN, it's teaching staff, or it's current or past post-grad students.

Once they clean out the garbage in the Comp Sci department and their research committee that approved this experiment, we can talk.

Re: “They introduce kernel bugs on purpose”

#716
post #413

Some clarifications since they are unclear in the original report. - Aditya Pakki (the author who sent the new round of seemingly bogus patches) is not involved in the S&P 2021 research. This means Aditya is likely to have nothing to do with the prior round of patching attempts that led to the S&P 2021 paper. - According to the authors' clarification [1], the S&P 2021 paper did not introduce any bugs into Linux kerne…

Aditya's advisor [1] is one of the co-authors of the paper. He at least knew about this work and was very likely involved with it. [1] https://adityapakki.github.io/assets/files/aditya_cv.pdf

[deleted]

Re: “They introduce kernel bugs on purpose”

#720

Me thinks that If you hold a degree from the University of Minnesota it would be a good idea to let your university know what you think of this.

Not a great selling point for the CS department. "Yes, we are banned from submitting patches to Linux due to past academic research and activities of our PhD students. However, we have a world-class program here."

I would argue it should be "due to past academic research and activities of our PhD students and professors"
Post reply on HN