Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

OpenAI agrees with Dept. of War to deploy models in their classified network

twitter.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

701–702 of 702 posts

Re: OpenAI agrees with Dept. of War to deploy models in their classified network

#701

Post by j_maffe »

PaulDavisThe1st wrote: post #699
j_maffe wrote: post #698

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Personally, as someone coming from a region that has suffered many times over by the actions of this so called "Ministry of Defense," I feel like "Department of War" is a more accurate and honest term.

As I've noted multiple times here on HN, I don't disagree with this. But the question is not about whether it is a more accurate and honest term. It is about people complying in advance with the illegal/extra-legal renaming of a federal agency by a president who does not have the right or authority to do so . If we were talking about Congress voting to rename the DoD as the DoW, I'd have nothing to say on the matter…

Yeah that's fair you guys should still call it DoD. I think I'm gonna stick to DoW from here on out though.

Re: OpenAI agrees with Dept. of War to deploy models in their classified network

#702

Post by [deleted] »

nullocator wrote: post #265
nandomrumber wrote: post #224

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From the referenced tweet; who decides these weighty questions? Approach (1), accepted by OAI, references laws and thus appropriately vests those questions in our democratic system. Approach (2) unacceptably vests those questions in a single unaccountable CEO who would usurp sovereign control of our most sensitive systems. Amodei is the type of person who thinks he can tell the US government what they can and can’t d…

> Amodei is the type of person who thinks he can tell the US government what they can and can’t do. > And the US government should have precisely none of that, regardless of whether they’re red or blue. This is a pretty hot take. "You can't break the law and kill people or do mass surveillance with our technology." fuck that, the government should break whatever laws and kill whoever they please I hope you A: aren't…

[deleted]
Post reply on HN