Live data from Hacker News

Threads, an Instagram app

apps.apple.com

701–710 of 1001 posts

Re: Threads, an Instagram app

#701
post #100

Look at that app privacy report. I didn’t expect anything less from Meta. Let’s hope they aren’t using all our Mastodon accounts for advertising too.

Well I for one am actually looking forward to relevant ads. On Twitter I've been shown everything from industrial mining supplies, nipple covers, psychology research papers, super yachts, home shopping network junk and just now an ad for an oral dosing technology conference.

You get ads on Twitter? Strange, my adblocker still works on the web version

Re: Threads, an Instagram app

#702
My question is, after the twitter fiasco, there is a number of competitors, like skyblue or this threads that have been created to remplace it (I dont count Mastodon, because it was not created to remplaced, but as an open alternative).

Why absolutely no big company (MS, facebook, google, amazon, etc...) is attempting the same with Reddit? Not even discord has done any single change to try to steal any userbase from it.

Re: Threads, an Instagram app

#703

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the Instagram branding is deliberate. Instagram is not a heavy political brand. This will attract the less controversial groups )like bird watchers) that generate great revenue while keeping out the controversial political ones that are massive money pits.

> I think the Instagram branding is deliberate. I think so to, which says a lot about Meta. They understand full well that the Facebook brand is tarnished, irrelevant, or at the very least "old hat". You couldn't launch a new product under the Facebook brand if you wanted to. The brand under which they launch isn't relevant though, they aren't going to compete with Twitter. The users they'd need to lure over are well…

The users they need to lure over are athletes, musicians, artists, actors etc. They all are already on Instagram, so they can use Threads while maintaining all their followers.

Re: Threads, an Instagram app

#704

On the fediverse, there's already a huge number of instances planning to block this app when possible as it isn't really in the spirit of the fediverse - it's proprietary, owned by a large company and centralized

>it's proprietary but uses an open standard >owned by a large company This doesn't contradict with the fediverse. Getting large companies on board is important for ActivityPub's adoption. >and centralized So is almost every other fediverse instance.

it stopped bridging XMPP so it already did the EEE strategy once

fool me once, shame on me

fool me twice, you can't fool me again

Re: Threads, an Instagram app

#705
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The number of people who have even heard of "federation" or "Mastodon" is a vanishingly small fraction of the target audience for this app. Why waste precious page space on it?

And if it is compatible with Mastodon, that audience will do all the advertising themselves.

Our audience will advertise defederating from it

Re: Threads, an Instagram app

#706

My question is, after the twitter fiasco, there is a number of competitors, like skyblue or this threads that have been created to remplace it (I dont count Mastodon, because it was not created to remplaced, but as an open alternative). Why absolutely no big company (MS, facebook, google, amazon, etc...) is attempting the same with Reddit? Not even discord has done any single change to try to steal any userbase from…

Facebook Groups competes with Reddit, I think.

Re: Threads, an Instagram app

#707
post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I take no view on whether Elon will be successful on making Twitter more profitable. But as a user -- and someone that typically supports Elon -- I have to say he's made the app subjectively worse IMO. I find the "For You" page and algorithm to boost more "junk" content than before. I used to find it interesting, now it feels like scrolling through Instagram meme pages. I'm at the point where I am thinking of uninsta…

Sorry your For You page sucks, but that's a you problem. My For You page is excellent - I see mostly the kind of tweets I like, and when I see a tweet I don't like I tap the not interested button. I actually love the new FYP way more than the old home feed, and the option to switch to the chronological "Followed" feed is more visible than before.

Why are you apoligising for Twitter? What are you sorry for?

Re: Threads, an Instagram app

#708

I'm calling it now, this is going to hollow out twitter in extremely rapid fashion. I give twitter a couple of months once this launches, they'll do a Wile E Coyote where they walk off the cliff, followed by plummeting. Meta is going to grind the blue bird to a fine powder, not saying this as a Meta fan, just a casual observer. There's massive pent-up demand for an alternative, and so far Bluesky and Mastodon haven't…

I was about to agree with you, until I noticed they called it a "text-based conversation app". I just scrolled through my Twitter feed, and out of the first 50 posts in my feed, 46 of them were accompanied by either an image or a video. If Threads truly is a text-only platform, then the communities I'm a part of won't have any use for it.

Re: Threads, an Instagram app

#709

I'm calling it now, this is going to hollow out twitter in extremely rapid fashion. I give twitter a couple of months once this launches, they'll do a Wile E Coyote where they walk off the cliff, followed by plummeting. Meta is going to grind the blue bird to a fine powder, not saying this as a Meta fan, just a casual observer. There's massive pent-up demand for an alternative, and so far Bluesky and Mastodon haven't…

This would be about the tenth death of Twitter proclaimed loudly and confidently on this very site. Meanwhile Twitter’s popularity continues to grow. Good luck with this one.

> Meanwhile Twitter’s popularity continues to grow

According to notorious liar Elon Musk.

Re: Threads, an Instagram app

#710

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My knee-jerk reaction to this is that it's immature posturing. The internet is a decentralized protocol with centralized entities. Email is a decentralized protocol with centralized entities. But for this decentralized protocol (Mastodon/ActivityPub), centralized entities are a bridge too far?

>. The internet is a decentralized protocol with centralized entities Maybe they're mature enough not to want that? Sign up to protonmail.com for some privacy, to have your emails not read by Proton Inc., and quickly realize that most – if not all – your contacts are receiving your messages @gmail.com. All your emails will still be exploited by Google Inc. There are good reasons to want the Fediverse to remain… diver…

Hi! Please note that you can send password-protected emails to your non-Proton recipients: https://proton.me/support/open-password-protected-emails.
Post reply on HN