Earlier quoted context omitted.
> If you try to use a file system to 99% full --- and it doesn't matter whether it is a 10GB file system or a 10TB file system, you will see significant performance penalties as the file system gets badly fragmented. Not true, I've checked. I have plenty of Linux ext3 servers running for many years that routinely drop down to 1% free space for extended periods before being cleaned-up, which still have essentially zer…
It's true, but it's more true for some file systems than others. When you write a file larger than the contiguous available space after its starting point, a file system must break the file into "extents" (chunks). The less space available, the smaller the extents tend to be, and the more fragmentation you will impose for continued writes. It's just math. Different file systems have wildly different strategies and da…
No, still completely untrue.
> When you write a file larger than the contiguous available space after its starting point, a file system must break the file
And why would having a 10TB file system force you to write 100GByte files, whereas a 10GB file system would write 100MByte files instead?
Because that's the topic you're responding to... GP said it doesn't matter whether it is a 10GB file system or a 10TB file system, it "gets badly fragmented" when you get to "99% full".