"Drag and drop enabled for nodes in Inspector markup view " This is going to make me never use Chrome dev tools again. Nice
I can't think of a situation that would make me want to move nodes around from place to place. Where would that be useful?
Firefox 39.0 released
71–80 of 105 posts
Re: Firefox 39.0 released
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
YES. Force them to upgrade their weak sites!
Which unfortunately costs time and money. Whilst yes, they should be up to date and secure, banks are pretty big businesses and require more time. One day they'll catch up.
Re: Firefox 39.0 released
#73"Drag and drop enabled for nodes in Inspector markup view " This is going to make me never use Chrome dev tools again. Nice
I can't think of a situation that would make me want to move nodes around from place to place. Where would that be useful?
Re: Firefox 39.0 released
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
The color was not specified before, so it was up to the font creator. I think yellow was the most common choice. The test page shows all the icons as blue in my browser. I'm not against the new changes, but I think the old version was more popular in Asian countries than anywhere else, and wasn't really pro-white.
> The color was not specified before, so it was up to the font creator. I think yellow was the most common choice. Nope. Usually white (Apple, Japanese phones).
Re: Firefox 39.0 released
#75Re: Firefox 39.0 released
#76Yey for progress, but one of the most annoying things for me with FF is that if I cmd-t for a new tab, I can't start typing right away for a new search and have that get preserved. There's always some lag and only then do my keys get transcribed. Safari and chrome don't have this problem, and it drives me insane.
Re: Firefox 39.0 released
#77I love that the Fetch API is happening (has happened!): https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Fetch_API fetch(url).then(data => ...) Not earth-shattering, but much more fun than XHR!
https://bachelorburnbook.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/image.p...
Re: Firefox 39.0 released
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The color was not specified before, so it was up to the font creator. I think yellow was the most common choice. Nope. Usually white (Apple, Japanese phones).
Thanks for the info. Still, it's hard to believe that Japanese phones would put Caucasian people all over their emoji. Related: "Why Do the Japanese Draw Themselves as White?" https://abagond.wordpress.com/2010/06/16/why-do-the-japanese...
A Japanese person draws a simple human face, an American draws a simple human face, both will draw "white" skin.
Re: Firefox 39.0 released
#79I love that the Fetch API is happening (has happened!): https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Fetch_API fetch(url).then(data => ...) Not earth-shattering, but much more fun than XHR!
Guess nobody told them, https://bachelorburnbook.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/image.p...
Re: Firefox 39.0 released
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks for the info. Still, it's hard to believe that Japanese phones would put Caucasian people all over their emoji. Related: "Why Do the Japanese Draw Themselves as White?" https://abagond.wordpress.com/2010/06/16/why-do-the-japanese...
They're not white in the sense of "European". They just have a light skin colour. Japanese skin isn't bright yellow. A Japanese person draws a simple human face, an American draws a simple human face, both will draw "white" skin.
How so? If you're white, perhaps you see no problem with making everyone's skin white.
But the billions of people who aren't white might have a problem with it.
I really thought you meant Caucasian. Did you just mean light-skinned?