Earlier quoted context omitted.
> But the layout, the major composition, is thought (typically) out of a grid system. And that's what, I believe, a designer focus on. Not on individual element rules, but on the whole. That might be true for print designers of yore, but we've moved beyond that in the last 10 years or so. Designers today know that it's not about some static composition on top of some grid. And they also know that individual elements…
Moved beyond grid systems? I can't agree with that. Also, I don't really see the connection you're implying between using a grid and having a static composition or not considering individual elements behaviour. I do compose out of a grid system; the best designers (or the real designers) I worked with do the same. And that doesn't mean that we won't specify how the profile pic responds to resize - we do. It's just th…
Good, because I haven't said so. I said we've moved beyond static designs on top of some grid.
When you add different screen sizes, resizing and interaction to the mix, the grid itself gets dynamic, and relationships between items (constrains) matter more than visual placement.
>It's just that it is a detail. It's not layout, it's not the composition.
The thing is that seems to me a relic of print design.
In modern UI design there's no fixed composition as such. Even whole elements might appear and disappear at will, based on the app's state.