Live data from Hacker News

AWS Lambda

aws.amazon.com

71–80 of 164 posts

Re: AWS Lambda

#71

It would be nice if a lambda could respond to web requests. Maybe an Elastic Loud Balancer could be an "event-source".

We support exactly this[1].

http://wym.io/

Incidentally I almost had a heart attack when I saw the Lambda announcement. :P

[1]: We also provide the ability to respond to other kinds of events as does Lambda.

Re: AWS Lambda

#72
post #67
post #64

Is it me or AWS is releasing too many services... there is a service for everything. I wounder if they are just throwing stuff out there see what sticks... kinda like landing pages.

To be fair, unlike google they are not cancelling any services. I think Amazon first builds these services for internal use, and then releases them to the public.

We will see. I hope I am wrong but how many of these are production ready? It seems to be that most of them are in preview/beta.

Re: AWS Lambda

#74
post #67
post #64

Is it me or AWS is releasing too many services... there is a service for everything. I wounder if they are just throwing stuff out there see what sticks... kinda like landing pages.

To be fair, unlike google they are not cancelling any services. I think Amazon first builds these services for internal use, and then releases them to the public.

As far as I know this isn't the case (used to work across from them)

Re: AWS Lambda

#75
I'm excited for this. This replaces what I wanted to use SQS for. SQS always felt like too much vendor lock-in to me to justify not using something like RabbitMQ or Beanstalkd.

With Lambda, the resource consuming the queue is managed for me - that is huge. Also, the pay by time model is perfect for this - instead of managing when to stop/start resource intensive instances, I don't even have to think about the problem. I only get charged what I used, which can be crucial during growth stages of a business or prototype.

The big penalty is the vendor lock-in, but this tips the scales for me for certain things.

Re: AWS Lambda

#76
post #3

I’ve had a chance to use the service for a couple of weeks. My quick summary review is that it’s a little tricky setting up the IAM roles and security groups, but once you have that going, it works great! I see a ton of potential here in transforming the way people use AWS. I also put together the Netflix use cases in the keynote so if you have any questions I’ll try to answer them!

Has the keynote been made public anywhere yet?

Re: AWS Lambda

#77
post #67
post #64

Is it me or AWS is releasing too many services... there is a service for everything. I wounder if they are just throwing stuff out there see what sticks... kinda like landing pages.

To be fair, unlike google they are not cancelling any services. I think Amazon first builds these services for internal use, and then releases them to the public.

To be fair, you have to pay per unit for these services, so as long as people are using them, Amazon is making money. Putting a service out to pasture in maintenance mode probably wouldn't cost that much.

Re: AWS Lambda

#78
post #4

Right now the only language/runtime supported is js/node, but they intend to include others. (figured people would want to know this, and you have to scroll a ways to find out, so)

From hearing the details it seems that there is no real limitation to what you can execute as long as it runs on the instance. I get the feeling that if you zipped up all of the parts of python or ruby you need to ru you could execute a script using either of them as long as you initiated it from your node script. The key word here is probably "support" and that may be more of an issue if you want to edit your scripts with their web IDE.

Re: AWS Lambda

#79
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you know if you can respond to events from SWS or SQS?

As of today, no. Probably coming in the future though. I got the impression that eventually all Aws services will emit events.

After reading the description of AWS Lambda, I expected SQS to be first in the list of event sources. Huh.

Re: AWS Lambda

#80
post #48

All these announcement are making me feel sorry for all the other players in the cloud game. The other guys don't even come close.

I feel sorry for all the people in 5 - 10 years who discover Amazonis now in a position to charge monopoly rents.

And yet, they don't. Compare that to Oracle. Plus, when Amazon makes a new cloud architecture that gets popular, others copy it. OpenStack will have this if need be in a year or two and then you can port to OS in 5 years when the rent goes up.

Oh, and FWIW, when has AWS raised a price? My servers have gotten cheaper every year I've had them with AWS (3).

Post reply on HN