How does this compare to Susskind's "The Theoretical Minimum"?
Feynman Lectures on Physics now free online
71–80 of 98 posts
Re: Feynman Lectures on Physics now free online
#72It is awesome how while the page is loading you see stuff like this: "Now if we multiply Eq. (41.19) by [math], [math]. We want the time average of [math], so let us take the average of the whole equation, and study the three terms. Now what about [math] times the force?" Soo... am I going to need math skills to understand this stuff?
Re: Feynman Lectures on Physics now free online
#73Great! This part kind of surprises me though: > However, we want to be clear that this edition is only free to read online, and this posting does not transfer any right to download all or any portion of The Feynman Lectures on Physics for any purpose. I know it doesn't actually mean anything in practice, but still, I'm shaking my head in disbelief that there's still people out there clinging to this mentality. Aside…
Re: Feynman Lectures on Physics now free online
#74Re: Feynman Lectures on Physics now free online
#75How does this compare to Susskind's "The Theoretical Minimum"?
Susskind's is much shorter and goes into very little detail. It's really intended to give you a foundation for learning physics, while Feynmann's is meant to teach you lots of physics.
Re: Feynman Lectures on Physics now free online
#76Great! This part kind of surprises me though: > However, we want to be clear that this edition is only free to read online, and this posting does not transfer any right to download all or any portion of The Feynman Lectures on Physics for any purpose. I know it doesn't actually mean anything in practice, but still, I'm shaking my head in disbelief that there's still people out there clinging to this mentality. Aside…
Re: Feynman Lectures on Physics now free online
#77It is awesome how while the page is loading you see stuff like this: "Now if we multiply Eq. (41.19) by [math], [math]. We want the time average of [math], so let us take the average of the whole equation, and study the three terms. Now what about [math] times the force?" Soo... am I going to need math skills to understand this stuff?
Yes. Calculus was basically invented to solve physics problems.
Re: Feynman Lectures on Physics now free online
#78How does this compare to Susskind's "The Theoretical Minimum"?
Susskind's is much shorter and goes into very little detail. It's really intended to give you a foundation for learning physics, while Feynmann's is meant to teach you lots of physics.
Re: Feynman Lectures on Physics now free online
#79Has anyone completed all of the 3 parts? How much time did it take you ?
That said, it's always helpful at first to skim through and get a surface understanding of the whole picture before you dive in and try to understand it all. You can probably complete a surface scan like that in a few weeks or months. I studied these becomes along with my high school physics course and completed the books in about a year, but I was spending double the usual amount of time on this stuff. As a high school student, I didn't have anything better to do, but as an adult I'd expect it to take me two dedicated years.
Re: Feynman Lectures on Physics now free online
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
Susskind's is much shorter and goes into very little detail. It's really intended to give you a foundation for learning physics, while Feynmann's is meant to teach you lots of physics.
The Feynman lectures certainly will teach you a lot, but I think it would be a fairly trying textbook for learning a lot of the material for the first time. Among other things, a very serious deficiency for self-education is a complete lack of problems to work (which just reflects that these really were lectures).