Seems to be a bit of a statistic maniac. http://dustincurtis.com/about.html
You should follow me on Twitter
71–75 of 75 posts
Re: You should follow me on Twitter
#72Re: You should follow me on Twitter
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
Assuming a truly random sample of 5000 unique, non-overlapping viewers for each experiment, the standard error for the experiments runs from .3% to .5%. The true value for any given sample is pretty likely (> 95%) to be within +/-2 standard errors. So in this case, the difference needs to be more than 0.6%~1.0%, depending on the experiments you're comparing. In other words, these look like they're significant differe…
Do you exclude traffic and clicks received from HN ?
Heh...well, I didn't do the experiment. I'm just the messenger.
Re: You should follow me on Twitter
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
Here are the other 49 tricks, briefly summarized: http://www.moskalyuk.com/blog/yes-50-scientifically-proven-w... (This link is via HN, naturally: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=613402 )
I wonder how to best apply this to job-seeking.. Hmm...
I guess the original suggestion corresponds to the "experience" section on your CV/resume; it's demonstrating that others have hired you.
Re: You should follow me on Twitter
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder how to best apply this to job-seeking.. Hmm...
I guess the original suggestion corresponds to the "experience" section on your CV/resume; it's demonstrating that others have hired you.
Yeah, that doesn't really work for someone just coming out of college next year, with no experience, unfortunately.