Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Opposing people learning things because what they might create with that knowledge is just wrong He doesn't oppose people learning things. > Obviously they're not going to be writing commercial or critical systems. No. That's exactly what he's talking about. The trend to hire more people rather than better people. FTA: "Do we really need to keep on recruiting and training cannon fodder to throw at software projects…
I did... the point with people learning to code is precisely not that they're going to get hired to write code (that's what we professionals do). The current craze for teaching people to code that he references has (in my experience at least) got nothing to do with creating a horde of junior devs, but is to do with people waking up to the fact that they're effectively illiterate. I agree entirely that 9 women can't p…
So then I don't understand the point of your comment, because it's not a response to anything said in the original article. You are responding to Uncle Bob on an issue he does not bring up.
Unless you are referring to the part about code academies, where he says:
"These programs are attracting people to them, and employers, desperate to add developers, are hiring them."
Which flies in the face of what you say in this comment.
So, I don't understand. What are you responding to? Maybe you misunderstood the premise?