Earlier quoted context omitted.
> There ain't no such thing as a prestige dialect in English. I sincerely hope this is sarcasm. > In all of them, "affect change" is just plain wrong. Cite?
Hello derleth: "Effect. As noun, means result; as verb, means to bring about, accomplish (not to be confused with affect, which means "to influence")." http://www.bartleby.com/141/strunk3.html Affect vs. Effect: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~sullivan/CommonWritingErrors.html#...
Rich Hickey's Greatest Hits
71–73 of 73 posts
Re: Rich Hickey's Greatest Hits
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
What basis for judgements of correctness would you suggest, if not facts about how English speakers speak English?
For correctness, it should be how educated speakers speak English. In this case, I would also settle for "how published authors write English."
Re: Rich Hickey's Greatest Hits
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hello derleth: "Effect. As noun, means result; as verb, means to bring about, accomplish (not to be confused with affect, which means "to influence")." http://www.bartleby.com/141/strunk3.html Affect vs. Effect: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~sullivan/CommonWritingErrors.html#...
Those sources don't define correctness. Especially Strunk and White, which is pretty well debunked at this point: http://www.languagehat.com/archives/003463.php