Live data from Hacker News

Rich Hickey's Greatest Hits

thechangelog.com

71–73 of 73 posts

Re: Rich Hickey's Greatest Hits

#71
post #70
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> There ain't no such thing as a prestige dialect in English. I sincerely hope this is sarcasm. > In all of them, "affect change" is just plain wrong. Cite?

Hello derleth: "Effect. As noun, means result; as verb, means to bring about, accomplish (not to be confused with affect, which means "to influence")." http://www.bartleby.com/141/strunk3.html Affect vs. Effect: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~sullivan/CommonWritingErrors.html#...

Those sources don't define correctness. Especially Strunk and White, which is pretty well debunked at this point:

http://www.languagehat.com/archives/003463.php

Re: Rich Hickey's Greatest Hits

#72
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What basis for judgements of correctness would you suggest, if not facts about how English speakers speak English?

For correctness, it should be how educated speakers speak English. In this case, I would also settle for "how published authors write English."

Are your notions of correctness defined by who can get publishing deals?

Re: Rich Hickey's Greatest Hits

#73
post #71
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hello derleth: "Effect. As noun, means result; as verb, means to bring about, accomplish (not to be confused with affect, which means "to influence")." http://www.bartleby.com/141/strunk3.html Affect vs. Effect: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~sullivan/CommonWritingErrors.html#...

Those sources don't define correctness. Especially Strunk and White, which is pretty well debunked at this point: http://www.languagehat.com/archives/003463.php

Sorry, derleth. It's not a matter of someone defining correct usage. It's simply a matter of looking at the dictionary definitions of the words 'affect' and 'effect'. Affect simply means to influence while effect means to bring about.
Post reply on HN