Live data from Hacker News

Why isn't there a Kickstarter for killing patents?

galenward.com

71–72 of 72 posts

Re: Why isn't there a Kickstarter for killing patents?

#71
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you really think that people can afford to crowdfund multi-year complex research into illnesses and diseases? http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1551949/ > It often takes more than 10 years to deliver a final, licensed vaccine,5 and requires not only excellence during research and product development but also managerial and funding commitment throughout the endeavor. The cost of developing a vaccine—from…

Do you really think that people can afford to crowdfund multi-year complex research into illnesses and diseases? Of course they can. Where do companies get their money from? Thin air?

from the sale of products they've invested years of research in. From angel funding and capital from the market, wealthy backers and philanthropists.

I find it hard to imagine that you could keep asking for more and more funding on a promise for a cure for something in 5-10 years down the road, and continue to have the same private individuals with very little personal wealth continue to throw their earnings at it.

I imagine that individual smaller projects may well benefit from it, but crowd-sourcing cancer or something equally grand, people would lose interest in it. Not because they don't care, but because human beings have human timescales attached to expectations. Something that has a hard to quantify immediate success or reward attached to it is less likely to attract attention and investment.

Re: Why isn't there a Kickstarter for killing patents?

#72
post #53

The flaw, here, I think, is that's it's still prohibitively expensive. If it takes hundreds of thousands of dollars to invalidate a patent, we're probably talking hundreds of millions of dollars to invalidate all of the patents that could be used for trolling. That's part of the problem, right? For each patent we hear about being killed, there are ten, twenty, or a hundred more waiting in the wings to take over. And…

Josh, you're right - that's why it isn't possible right now. I put that we need a simpler, cheaper way to invalidate patents before a patent-killing x-prize is possible in the post, but maybe not clearly or loudly enough.
Post reply on HN