Live data from Hacker News

Two Providers of Secure E-Mail Shut Down

bits.blogs.nytimes.com

71–72 of 72 posts

Re: Two Providers of Secure E-Mail Shut Down

#71
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And if the other side happens to be self-hosted as well or an provider based outside the US?

The NSA is primarily concerned with communication outside of the US. You would have less protection with a foreign provider.

Given that I am not an US-citizen I would argue that I am better of an provider outside.. namely myself. Have fun puzzling together a complete picture from dozens of providers.

Re: Two Providers of Secure E-Mail Shut Down

#72
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And if the other side happens to be self-hosted as well or an provider based outside the US?

Since when did the American government care about things being outside the US?

Since it's more work to coerce the mail provider into providing them the data, by finding something dirty about them or something like that.

If they just send their subpoena without any of that, it will just end up in /dev/null and that's the end of the story.

Post reply on HN