I rarely read even the articles with interesting titles that make it to HN's front page. This is because when I did read more of them, they usually turned out to be a lot less interesting than the ensuing discussion on HN. So now I use the HN discussion as a proxy for article quality. In the HN discussion I can often find a good summary of the article and get a sense of whether the article is likely to be worth readi…
Agreed, I'm the same way, I probably haven't clicked an article on HN in weeks, I usually just read the comment sections of articles that have interesting titles.
HN front page, 16000 visitors in a day, how many actually read the article?
71–75 of 75 posts
Re: HN front page, 16000 visitors in a day, how many actually read the article?
#72Re: HN front page, 16000 visitors in a day, how many actually read the article?
#73Here's a bit of data: last week my page http://www.gwern.net/Google%20shutdowns was submitted to Hacker News and hit the front page for a while, racking up thousands of visitors. As it happens, I was running an A/B test on fonts, where a JavaScript timer sleeps 40 seconds and then fires, telling Google Analytics that a reader has 'converted'. (This hopefully avoids the bouncing distortion of the 'time on page' metric…
What happens if a user is running noscript?
Re: HN front page, 16000 visitors in a day, how many actually read the article?
#74I rarely read even the articles with interesting titles that make it to HN's front page. This is because when I did read more of them, they usually turned out to be a lot less interesting than the ensuing discussion on HN. So now I use the HN discussion as a proxy for article quality. In the HN discussion I can often find a good summary of the article and get a sense of whether the article is likely to be worth readi…
"You read the article? You must be new here!", etc