Xiaomi Mimo 2.6 live post-training dashboard

Post by trollbridge » Thu, Sep 17, 2026, 1:47 AM UTC

rapind wrote: post #66

joelwallis wrote: post #11

I been using MiMo-V2.5 to do most of my work as software engineer, on a variety of projects I'm working on, and I been VERY happy with ROI. The model is very powerful! Not perfect – I've run in hallucination loops once or twice, but nothing a stop-then-continue wouldn't solve. The cost is unbelievably low, and the quality of intelligence I get is equivalent to when I was working mostly with Anthropic models (late las…

I’ve been very pleased with DS 4.1 flash. Not so much the 4.0 models, but for coding (Rust) it’s been great so far (3 solid days of work). I’ll give Mimo a try.

Post by girvo » Thu, Sep 17, 2026, 2:19 AM UTC

walrus01 wrote: post #24

joelwallis wrote: post #11

I been using MiMo-V2.5 to do most of my work as software engineer, on a variety of projects I'm working on, and I been VERY happy with ROI. The model is very powerful! Not perfect – I've run in hallucination loops once or twice, but nothing a stop-then-continue wouldn't solve. The cost is unbelievably low, and the quality of intelligence I get is equivalent to when I was working mostly with Anthropic models (late las…

I've found that mimo v2.5 works for very basic things like a python script to do one thing, but it also is very 'dumb' compared to qwen 3.8-flash-next (I think the benchmark scores for terminal and coding specific benches back this up). And definitely not in the same class as like a GLM5.2 or 5.3. It's fast but makes basic mistakes that only get caught later.

Post by thenews » Thu, Sep 17, 2026, 2:29 AM UTC

Post by hsbalanxvxjsmab » Thu, Sep 17, 2026, 2:37 AM UTC

Post by hsbalanxvxjsmab » Thu, Sep 17, 2026, 2:42 AM UTC

impulser_ wrote: post #27

The Chinese labs are just making fun of the US labs at this point. Where is the cool shit from the US labs?