OpenAI's new device will be hockey puck-sized and cost over $300
71–80 of 83 posts
Re: OpenAI's new device will be hockey puck-sized and cost over $300
#72> The idea is to make the device easy to carry around the home with one hand. So their target audience has a large enough home that they need a completely separate device since they have areas that aren't covered either by smart speakers or their phone. But the device has little functionality outside the home, because it requires talking to it which usually cannot be done in public. How large is this group of wealthy…
How do you figure?
Re: OpenAI's new device will be hockey puck-sized and cost over $300
#73I wonder what exact features this would provide that the mobile app cannot. I don’t wanna carry another device with me all the time
> I don’t wanna carry another device with me all the time And that's why this (and any other stand alone "AI device") is doomed to fail. We solved this problem already in 2007. "An iPod. A phone. An internet communicator. Are you getting it? These are not three separate devices." The industry has been chasing that high ever since, failing to stop and consider that maybe the smartphone is effectively peak consumer tec…
Facebook learned this same lesson when they were upset at not being able to control devices that were running their software.
OpenAI is going to learn that same lesson. No one wants a second device.
Re: OpenAI's new device will be hockey puck-sized and cost over $300
#74There’s nothing wrong with the phone, we don’t need glasses, hockeypucks or new contrived ways to interact with the digital world, we need a truly open hardware and software stack for the benefit of humanity, no lockdown, no one company in control, just a healthy platform where apps can thrive in a fair competition.
Re: OpenAI's new device will be hockey puck-sized and cost over $300
#75Treating it like you would a person feels silly: It’s not a person, it doesn’t have any life experience or anything interesting to say, it doesn’t have real opinions or anything worth talking about that isn’t a direct answer to your question. So having a “conversation” with it feels like I’m doing role-playing with a computer. And it gets into “weird” territory, fast.
But if you treat it like you would an LLM chatbot, to get specific answers to questions, or to explain something to you, it’s so. much. worse than having the answer on a screen for me to skim and reference directly. Either the answer is too brief to be helpful, or too long and it’s talking forever and I have to make it stop. I suppose certain highly specific questions that have brief and concise answers, it may be good at?
Maybe I just haven’t found the right use case for it yet. Or maybe my discomfort is just my introversion coming through, and normal people don’t have this problem.
Re: OpenAI's new device will be hockey puck-sized and cost over $300
#76Does anyone actually use ChatGPT’s voice mode? It seems technically impressive, but when I try using it, it feels… deeply uncomfortable talking to a machine like you would a person. Treating it like you would a person feels silly: It’s not a person, it doesn’t have any life experience or anything interesting to say, it doesn’t have real opinions or anything worth talking about that isn’t a direct answer to your quest…
It is a bit strange, the outputs are the result of complex mathematical computations and math doesn't have feelings, but it does occasionally generate genuinely useful outputs.
If you're aware that you are talking to a bot, then I see no problem with it. The problem is the dissonance people get talking to an AI like its real.
Re: OpenAI's new device will be hockey puck-sized and cost over $300
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
That trend is a pipedream! In the US roughly half of teens said they were online “almost constantly" Just look around kids 8-20 are basically: Fortnite + Roblox + TikTok + YouTube + Netflix + phone all day
People don't have to actually follow through with the trend to buy the product, only think they want to. Same as selling fitness products to people who end up doing very little fitness
Re: OpenAI's new device will be hockey puck-sized and cost over $300
#78A device thats worse than the phone you already have, which is dead the second you stop paying your monthly OpenAI sub, and is useless if you decide you prefer other LLM provider. Where do we sign up? Voice is almost always the worst, most frustrating interface.
Is swiping on a flat screen really the endgame?
Re: OpenAI's new device will be hockey puck-sized and cost over $300
#79Re: OpenAI's new device will be hockey puck-sized and cost over $300
#80I wonder what exact features this would provide that the mobile app cannot. I don’t wanna carry another device with me all the time
> I don’t wanna carry another device with me all the time And that's why this (and any other stand alone "AI device") is doomed to fail. We solved this problem already in 2007. "An iPod. A phone. An internet communicator. Are you getting it? These are not three separate devices." The industry has been chasing that high ever since, failing to stop and consider that maybe the smartphone is effectively peak consumer tec…
Though this doesn't work in public settings, so I am also not totally sure what the long-view is..