71–80 of 98 posts
Doesn't matter; have DeepSeek. US AI companies are too busy shaving their heads into their own rear sides. I don't know what would happen when DeepSeek inevitably catch up though. Perhaps that's going to be how this wave of AI hype ends?
Do you think people behind DeepSeek don't have their own interests? And people/parties controlling people behind DeepSeek?
Open weights are a one-way ratchet.
How many books were they (LLMs) trained on illegally?
wouldn't be surprised if pretty much all the training data is legal now, at least retroactively from having obtained copies later.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would wager that many people are eager to read George R.R. Martin's latest were he unable to finish it. Stieg Larsson's Lisbeth Salander has featured in works written by others after his death. Why not AI?
1. AI is incapable of doing this well, and that seems unlikely to change. 2. No one who appreciates those books wants this.
Wuddabout: Works unfinished at the time of the author's death? Abandoned works? Lost works? Prompt: Aristotle's work on comedy has been lost. Write a short treatise on comedy, using Aristotle's methods as shown in his Corpus and especially his treatises on Rhetoric and Poetics.
Useless. The work is still lost or abandoned.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> truesight of obscure forum posters What does this mean?
It's almost like a claudeism
If anything, you probably have the causation backwards: Claude talks like a LessWrong poster.
This is rich considering LLMs can't even write like an average person let alone famous authors
LLMs cannot write dialogue between two characters where one person knows a fact and the other person doesn't. It will consistently make the character who shouldn't know something bring up said fact and I have not found a model which will not do this. All these years of LLM research and it fails grade schooler level logic, if it is even slightly abstracted behind a story.