71–79 of 79 posts
Operationally (and anecdotally obv) we've found that accessing Claude via AWS Bedrock has been notably more stable than direct to Anthropic.
AWS is hosting those models on different infrastructure. So I guess Amazon is better at hosting their models than they are. Or it just gets a lot less traffic.
I don't know why people keep posting these
I would say "Elected errors _in_ Claude Opus 5" wouldn't be incorrect either.. Opus 5 isn't very reliable for coding and introduces a lot of regressions every single time I use it. Do you have the same experiences?
I've read that Opus 5 has more success if used with Fable as orchestrator, but since I refuse to pay for subscription access to Fable, I'm now trying Opus 4.6 as orchestrator (also since that was the version that got me loving Claude), and Opus 5 low effort as implementor.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is not a joke https://claude.ai/share/44ddde69-e4bc-4569-8186-cf12ff44b35d
That's crazy, I wonder what your customization settings are?
I'm getting the opus 5 error on auto mode a lot for 2 days now and the Anthropic help has been very frustrating, only an agent that promised to connect me to a human but never did. Message: claude-opus-5 is temporarily unavailable, so auto mode cannot determine the safety of Bash right now. Wait briefly and then try this action again. If it keeps failing, continue with other tasks that don't require this action and c…