71–80 of 110 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn't LLM training, the development?
LLMs come complete they don't train on the fly based on interaction with the world. LLMs are wikipedia if they stopped allowing edits and all of the previous edits are training.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Parrots can also sound extremely human, but it’s only mimicry. How do we know the difference?
If you want to know if something is a human or a parrot, you could give it a paint brush and ask it to paint the Mona Lisa.
reminds me of those jokes?
what is difference between a parot and a human? silence rly? u cant tell the difference between a parot and a human? :')
The most interesting result for me is that they apparently prompted the models to optimize for SSIM, but many of the models trend worse over time. I suppose because viewing the canvas always comes after drawing, and they didn't give "revert to previous" capability as part of the toolkit. Which in turn kinda jives with my experience of using these models for code: to some extent they only seem to have a concept of "fo…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
"You can't QoS that" sounds like the title of a nerdcore rap song.
Some of my poetry has clear IT jargon, but it's a very small portion of it ( For some reason, OpenAI models, Gemini (and apparently Grok too), love to latch onto this and obsess over this idea that it's "programming poetry" or "poetry for the IT crowd". Often OpenAI and Gemini try to write the "equations of my poetry" (granted, I do write about a cyclical relationship between thinking, feeling and writing a lot, and…
The Grok ones are amusing, almost comically bad. However, whenever I've tried to pass an image creation request to any of the Opus models, it's been far worse, like first week of using Microsoft Paint bad (while ChatGPT would create social media quality images using the same prompts)
Give Opus access to an image model, and it will use that to create images just fine just like ChatGPT.
Grok! LOL! Seriously, what's going on there ? Why is it so different from others? Is it just behind technologically/training wise or it's using something fundamentally different?
The razor-wire at the bottom for Starry Night was clever, and very Grok. Really shows its military spirit. Edit: I just don't see the point of redacting the Mona Lisa
As I looked through the images I was unimpressed entirely, at first. But, then I started thinking, these look a little... "childish" to me. Childish as in... A newish artist who is drawing a concept rather than light / forms (Which is something artists typically do as they understand drawing more and more). The rose in the vase specifically - some models understood that there was supposed to be shading, reflections,…
Now add Deepseek, GLM and Kimi :-)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, but Parrots don't mimic the stages of learning speech development like children do. They just memorize a phrase. These SOTA LLMs aren't trying to mimic existing children's drawings, but interestingly they're following somewhat similar progression that human children do as they develop.
They don’t develop. We should stop anthropomorphizing LLMs. AI labs are improving the ML techniques used to build better models; it’s a big difference.