Live data from Hacker News

The US Used to Demand the Best Tech. Now We Ban It

pcmag.com

71–80 of 110 posts

Re: The US Used to Demand the Best Tech. Now We Ban It

#71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Youre right, i forgot to add 4) europeans are environemtally conscious Americans however like their gas guzzling F150s. The reason I did the original comment was I know for a time the major car companies did a huge push into EVs. Like the ford 150 lightning, chevy bolt and mustang mach E. But they stopped manufacturing them due to weakened sales and profitability. Its a vicious feedback loop of consumer adoption, hig…

> Americans however like their gas guzzling F150s. Pickup trucks have always made up between 10% and 20% of vehicles on the road in America; it's the SUV that has picked up from next to nothing in 1980 to almost half of all new vehicles now, while the sedan has plunged from 80% to about 25% of new vehicles today. A big part of that transition to larger SUVs (which are not F150s) was the CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel E…

> Pickup trucks have always made up between 10% and 20% of vehicles on the road in America

This is false. It's true today that sales are in that range. It is not remotely true that actual ownership is 10%-20% today nor that it was in the past

Re: The US Used to Demand the Best Tech. Now We Ban It

#72

>Americans watch the rest of the world getting better, cheaper, ... If we wanted cheap cars, there needs to be demand to justify building giga factories of EVs. There just wasnt sufficient consumer demand to justify the giga factory investments China CAN generate demand for EVs because they have the political ability to 1) force gas restricted cars to only drive on certain days of the week 2) create a brutal lottery…

If we ignore the cultural issues with Americans where some places buying an EV is considered "gay" (because that is inheritently negative to them) then we can easily point to the hostile lobbying tactics and government capitulation via bought congressmen. Go look at the historical hostilities Tesla faced when first trying to take off. If I still lived in the US, I'd be hesitant to buy an EV because the infrastructure…

If the US government quit subsidizing oil companies and traditional automakers, there’d be more incentive to make good, affordable EVs, and more incentive for Americans to buy them.

Re: The US Used to Demand the Best Tech. Now We Ban It

#73
post #38

I've said this before and I will say it again. I don't see any problem in allowing Chinese cars in the US if China manufactures them here under a 49:51 joint venture with an American company. Also, I'm not sure how long CCP will keep on bankrolling their car companies. They are now competing with each other pushing the profits lower. Over the last year BYD stock is down 40%. Take a look at their auto manufacturers in…

I want the world to be a "I trust you" place. But the world, unfortunately, has changed with everything being connected online.

If the USA government showed up at Apple and Google with guns and said "Shut down all the iOS and Android devices in France, Germany, and Japan or else", Apple and Google, AFAICT, can do that today. They could brick every iOS device and nearly every Android device. I'm actually a little surprised that more countries haven't noticed.

Similary, cars are going in the same direction. A few companies can brick every connected car they make, by region, if they want / are forced to.

I don't have a solution. I'd buy a BYD if I could as my next car and just cross my fingers it never came to that.

Re: The US Used to Demand the Best Tech. Now We Ban It

#74

I don't understand the surprise in this article. This particular story is absolutely nothing new—the Germans and Japanese did it first to the US car market, which is inefficient, stuck in a bygone era, and propped up by government protectionism. Nearly all* American cars have been backwards in all metrics since about the 1970s. In general, if you wanted... Reliability: Japanese. Value: Korean, French, Japanese. Perfo…

> And today, Chinese marques are eating everyone's lunch on every metric in the EV sector because

the industry is running at a loss, and dumping below cost products on the global markets.

Re: The US Used to Demand the Best Tech. Now We Ban It

#75

US bans are based on the incorrect idea that we have control over AI. But the ban only reduces the most advanced model available from US companies. Models from other countries continue development. It's as if the US decided to hit pause on competing on AI and we're just going to let someone else win it. The US could be using these models to fix bugs and defend out systems.. but instead, we're all waiting for open sou…

The public will get ~5.5 level models. Private industry will essentially get ITAR access to better models, and other countries will get 5.5 with maybe some select partners getting access. Its totally sensible that the US will keep strong AI to itself to boost its own industry. (ITAR is a very low bar, but you need to be a citizen and your employer must fill out some forms.)

“Private industry” as defined by Musk, Ellison, Kushner and Trump.

Im so sick of winning. Im so happy for the future of the US and humanity. Yey tech bros.

Re: The US Used to Demand the Best Tech. Now We Ban It

#76
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

4) People in China want to save money on gas, while America prefers to bitch about gas prices, while doing nothing to switch away from gas-guzzling ICE land yachts.

You've cracked the code on this one, it's not the fact that someone realized they could use labor arbitrage 50 years ago to get rich while selling the American people down the river. Treason in the name of profit.

Labor arbitrage isn't why the average personal vehicle MPG in the US is 25, but 40 in Europe.

Nobody bombed us, all our problems are self-inflicted. Reducing America's oil and energy consumption was a priority for both parties until fracking was discovered and the Republicans fully committed to setting the world on fire.

Re: The US Used to Demand the Best Tech. Now We Ban It

#77

US bans are based on the incorrect idea that we have control over AI. But the ban only reduces the most advanced model available from US companies. Models from other countries continue development. It's as if the US decided to hit pause on competing on AI and we're just going to let someone else win it. The US could be using these models to fix bugs and defend out systems.. but instead, we're all waiting for open sou…

The public will get ~5.5 level models. Private industry will essentially get ITAR access to better models, and other countries will get 5.5 with maybe some select partners getting access. Its totally sensible that the US will keep strong AI to itself to boost its own industry. (ITAR is a very low bar, but you need to be a citizen and your employer must fill out some forms.)

Its totally sensible that the US will keep strong AI to itself to boost its own industry.

No, it isn't. What in the world would lead you to think that will be an option?

Anything we develop can and will be duplicated elsewhere and distributed widely.

Re: The US Used to Demand the Best Tech. Now We Ban It

#78

I don't understand the surprise in this article. This particular story is absolutely nothing new—the Germans and Japanese did it first to the US car market, which is inefficient, stuck in a bygone era, and propped up by government protectionism. Nearly all* American cars have been backwards in all metrics since about the 1970s. In general, if you wanted... Reliability: Japanese. Value: Korean, French, Japanese. Perfo…

> And today, Chinese marques are eating everyone's lunch on every metric in the EV sector because the industry is running at a loss, and dumping below cost products on the global markets.

I hear this about every Chinese product from steel to LLMs, but it can't be possible to run every industry at a loss at the same time, especially not for a net-creditor nation. Which Chinese industries are running the surplus that subsidizes the rest?

Re: The US Used to Demand the Best Tech. Now We Ban It

#79

US bans are based on the incorrect idea that we have control over AI. But the ban only reduces the most advanced model available from US companies. Models from other countries continue development. It's as if the US decided to hit pause on competing on AI and we're just going to let someone else win it. The US could be using these models to fix bugs and defend out systems.. but instead, we're all waiting for open sou…

The public will get ~5.5 level models. Private industry will essentially get ITAR access to better models, and other countries will get 5.5 with maybe some select partners getting access. Its totally sensible that the US will keep strong AI to itself to boost its own industry. (ITAR is a very low bar, but you need to be a citizen and your employer must fill out some forms.)

According to this logic, Taiwan should keep the most advanced chips to itself, the EU should keep the most advanced chip lithography machines to itself, etc etc.

Re: The US Used to Demand the Best Tech. Now We Ban It

#80
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

New car sales in Europe in 2026 are approaching 50% EV with essentially none of the above. Europe has had generous EV subsidies in the past, but in 2026 those are mostly (but not completely) gone.

EV’s do well in parts of the U.S. with good charging infrastructure. One of the challenges is this country is huge and there are large numbers of people in places where infrastructure or other factors make it difficult to drive an EV. Probably half the people in this country live in rural areas and smaller towns where the charging infrastructure doesn’t exist and doesn’t make much sense because no one drives an EV. I…

99% of the American population lives within 50 miles of an Interstate. All of the interstates have good fast charger coverage in 2026.

https://www.reddit.com/r/MapPorn/comments/dmmgl5/78_of_the_c...

Edit: that link is awful. So my 99% claim is also likely off a bit too. But I bet it's not off by a lot.

Post reply on HN