Live data from Hacker News

Michigan spent $1.8B and only created 602 jobs

msn.com

71–80 of 96 posts

Re: Michigan spent $1.8B and only created 602 jobs

#71
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Our public transportation infrastructure literally cost 10x per mile than France or Hong Kong. That's not waste to you? For what California has spent/is spending on high-speed rail from nowhere to nowhere, China blanketed their country? Notice you also left out police. How's our spending working there?

I’d note that China does not need democratic approval for any of its projects and thus is substantially more efficient.

And what lesson should be drawn from that?

Re: Michigan spent $1.8B and only created 602 jobs

#72
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>There doesn’t seem to be any lesson-learning happening... Which would indicate that creating jobs was not the actual reason for the grants. Given how trivially easy it would be fix the problem (simply make the grant contingent on the creation of jobs, otherwise it converts to a loan), the real purpose is probably a matter of generating headlines and raking in campaign contributions (with occasional full-on kickbacks…

> Given how trivially easy it would be fix the problem (simply make the grant contingent on the creation of jobs, otherwise it converts to a loan Sounds like a good way to create lots of fake jobs and scammy businesses.

Pretty easy to check on. And I'm not sure how the company would profit from giving away money to thousands of people who didn't work. And even if for some reason they did, we've seen that it actually stimulates the economy, which is the whole point.

Re: Michigan spent $1.8B and only created 602 jobs

#73
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>There doesn’t seem to be any lesson-learning happening... Which would indicate that creating jobs was not the actual reason for the grants. Given how trivially easy it would be fix the problem (simply make the grant contingent on the creation of jobs, otherwise it converts to a loan), the real purpose is probably a matter of generating headlines and raking in campaign contributions (with occasional full-on kickbacks…

Implementing your loan-contingency wouldn't prevent generating headlines, so that would only leave contributions and kickbacks.

If the program actually does create jobs, it doesn't much matter whether or not the politician benefits, because it still serves the public interest.

Re: Michigan spent $1.8B and only created 602 jobs

#74
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Our public transportation infrastructure literally cost 10x per mile than France or Hong Kong. That's not waste to you? For what California has spent/is spending on high-speed rail from nowhere to nowhere, China blanketed their country? Notice you also left out police. How's our spending working there?

California high speed rail has been a mess. Which is likely in part because politics dictating routes has raised the costs and timelines substantially. On a smaller scale SF was building a new subway in 2013 that had been on the drawing board for years. I remember thinking maybe I'd ride it to work one day. Opened in 2023 or 2024, after I had moved offices twice and then went to work from home. It's not a terrible li…

Note Atherton's delays cost Caltrain electrification 3 years and $400m IIRC

https://peninsulaforeveryone.org/blog/atherton-spent-145k-to...

Re: Michigan spent $1.8B and only created 602 jobs

#75

[flagged]

California has the 10th largest economy in the world. There's a reason people like you would never actually live in a conservative state like Mississippi.

4th largest as of 2025 - are you adjusting for CoL?

https://www.gov.ca.gov/2025/04/23/california-is-now-the-4th-...

Re: Michigan spent $1.8B and only created 602 jobs

#76
post #5

selectively giving away free money to big business is straight corruption. there is no other way to put it. everyone involved should lose re election and get investigated by the financial crimes unit. but i dont think "leave it up to the market" is a better idea. investments like this just need to be transparent, open to everyone and set up strict punishment for stealing the money with prison for executives. if they…

> open competitive programs based on project quality This will never, ever happen. There will always be bonus points available, even if they're awarded to "conservative"-leaning feel-good attributes like veteran-owned sponsor businesses. These investments are likely to always fail at their declared purpose. Better to put the money towards free childcare and maybe trying to convince parents to read to their kids.

> There will always be bonus points available, even if they're awarded to "conservative"-leaning feel-good attributes like veteran-owned sponsor businesses.

Why are you singling out "conservative" causes?

Re: Michigan spent $1.8B and only created 602 jobs

#78
post #21

> Hohman examined eight major projects—"those that offered $100 million in payments and received significant media attention"—totaling $2.7 billion in promised incentives > All told, the governor said that her major subsidy projects would create 20,595 jobs in Michigan Even using these numbers that works out to $135k/job, which is bonkers!

Not really, if the job lasts 30 years it will absolutely offset itself with local economic activity. These people will pay taxes, buy homes, visit doctors and much more.

No they won’t the money will go to the local branch of Kroger Walmart McDonalds and Home Depot who will pay their shareholders and all the money will leave

Re: Michigan spent $1.8B and only created 602 jobs

#79
post #78
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not really, if the job lasts 30 years it will absolutely offset itself with local economic activity. These people will pay taxes, buy homes, visit doctors and much more.

No they won’t the money will go to the local branch of Kroger Walmart McDonalds and Home Depot who will pay their shareholders and all the money will leave

Pretty sure those places have employees, suppliers, and vendors.

Re: Michigan spent $1.8B and only created 602 jobs

#80
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The reason you never hear that is because waste and fraud are very low in reality. That’s why this made the news. It’s uncommon. We should be using the government to help people and when we do, it often does a good job. Examples: Roads, libraries, fire departments, schools, safety regulations…

Our public transportation infrastructure literally cost 10x per mile than France or Hong Kong. That's not waste to you? For what California has spent/is spending on high-speed rail from nowhere to nowhere, China blanketed their country? Notice you also left out police. How's our spending working there?

I mean building infrastructure is literally done by private groups the government hires not the government itself. Infantalizing the government as unable to do anything is the biggest myth of the 20th century. When the government did build the roads for the interstate high system they were much cheaper. They cut through any possible regulations and just built them. If government is slow its because we have regulated government to be slow because people would get tremendous power and than plow over large African American communities with roads and rail roads. Its very well documented the speed and brutality that government can move with.

All this to say the government can be fast and efficient mostly because we have an almost infinite number of examples in the US of it doing it.

Post reply on HN