Live data from Hacker News

Poll: What's your favorite static site generator?

news.ycombinator.com

71–80 of 124 posts

Re: Poll: What's your favorite static site generator?

#71

Pelican http://getpelican.com/&#62 ; is a Python-based static site generator with a very active community behind it. It has a good mix of features without being overly complicated. Check it out! (Disclaimer: I'm a Pelican project committer.)

I really enjoy Pelican. It's simple.

For other devs: if you're familiar with Jinja, then you're 80% of the way there.

Re: Poll: What's your favorite static site generator?

#72
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Site generators of this type form a happy medium between the inefficiency of writing HTML from scratch (after all, most boils down to templates filled with content) and the inefficiency of regenerating static content upon every request (as WP and Drupal are prone to do). If there's no dynamic stuff on your site, why pull everything from a database? And if you save time by using templates, why roll your own HTML?

but most of the best static sites so far have a different view.. so, to make a different view, we cant use a template. but i would be interested in leaning these things. i'm on a windows. can suggestion how to install and get started with octopress(seems to be the best)?

This should get you started: http://blog.zerosharp.com/setting-up-octopress-on-windows/

Re: Poll: What's your favorite static site generator?

#74
post #37

Hakyll, since it has Haskell type safety goodness and is very customizable (it's basically a Haskell EDSL for static site generation): http://jaspervdj.be/hakyll/ The other nice thing about Hakyll is that it uses Pandoc, so it supports different input and output formats (such as HTML slide generation from Markdown).

I just started using Hakyll and it's really awesome. It's very configurable, and integrating with Pandoc makes it very versatile. Maybe this doesn't matter to most people, but having Pandoc means support for math (e.g. TeX) is standard. I have a fairly complicated setup at the moment, and yet it still has less than 100 lines of configuration. Also, being in Haskell, I've found it pretty fast so far despite being writ…

  > I'm short, Hakyll is awesome.
A good solution for the vertically challenged. :)

Re: Poll: What's your favorite static site generator?

#75
post #37

Hakyll, since it has Haskell type safety goodness and is very customizable (it's basically a Haskell EDSL for static site generation): http://jaspervdj.be/hakyll/ The other nice thing about Hakyll is that it uses Pandoc, so it supports different input and output formats (such as HTML slide generation from Markdown).

I just started using Hakyll and it's really awesome. It's very configurable, and integrating with Pandoc makes it very versatile. Maybe this doesn't matter to most people, but having Pandoc means support for math (e.g. TeX) is standard. I have a fairly complicated setup at the moment, and yet it still has less than 100 lines of configuration. Also, being in Haskell, I've found it pretty fast so far despite being writ…

> Maybe this doesn't matter to most people, but having Pandoc means support for math (e.g. TeX) is standard.

I like the optimism in that "maybe" at the beginning of the sentence.

Re: Poll: What's your favorite static site generator?

#77
I tried Octopress, but didn't like the default theme/layout — I wanted to design my own theme, and was hoping to build up a site from scratch, not rip out what was already there. After considering a bunch of Python-based SSGs which didn't impress me for various reasons, I went with Jekyll and have been quite happy.

One feature on my todo list is to find a way to add infinite scrolling (this is 2012, I don't think blogs should have “Next Page” anymore!). It seems it shouldn't be too hard but a quick search suggests nobody has tried this with Jekyll (or Octopress) yet.

Post reply on HN