Live data from Hacker News

Using Kagi Search with Low Vision

veroniiiica.com

71–80 of 94 posts

Re: Using Kagi Search with Low Vision

#71
post #24

I've been using Kagi for a while now and I'm never going back to Google. Everything is just so much better when you are not the product.

The feature that sold me was the domain block feature. Search results are so much better when they dont include SEO'd garbage, sites with entirely AI generated content, or userbenchmark.com

Re: Using Kagi Search with Low Vision

#72
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We have a big overhaul of Kagi Maps coming, stay tuned :)

How do you feel your data for Kagi Maps compares to Google Maps? It's the kind of thing that's harder to test than switching web searches over to Kagi. I need to already know that the business and transit data is reliable which is why I still go to Google Maps.

Local queries are the I've things I use Google for still -- but Kagi makes it easy, you just start your query with !g and it redirects you. So it's pretty safe to switch the default.

Re: Using Kagi Search with Low Vision

#73

I just tried it and the search results are terrible. Maybe because Google knows things about me, I guess I can give them the benefit of that doubt. Clearly inferior to Google though.

Do you have some example searches that you made? I’m not a heavy search user and not a programmer but I’ve still found the experience on par or better for all of my general searching.

Re: Using Kagi Search with Low Vision

#74

I really appreciate clearly custom websites. My eyes are also quite bad (legally blind.) Nearly ironically, because the site is already created for low vision, it had issues with the things that I do. Dark Reader froze up (uncommon) and the font was, for the first time, too large. I am glad to see someone else enjoying Kagi.

I was wondering why my browser was not happy with her site. Indeed, Dark Reader was struggling with it. I've never seen that before.

Legally blind here too o7

Re: Using Kagi Search with Low Vision

#75
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, but it they make a monthly subscription to the restaurant, they should get a mean before hand.

Isn't that exactly what the free trial is for? Am I missing something?

Well, yes. You are right.

But as I read the OP it is that he objects to the barrier of entry. He would prefer (possibly very harsh) rate limiting over the hassle of registrering an account. Maybe combined with a weak "nag" screen.

It might be hard implementing in a bulletproof way as IP restrictions are easy to circumvent. But it might be "good enough" to drive more adoption.

I'm a bit on the fence. It would be an interesting experiment.

Re: Using Kagi Search with Low Vision

#76
post #24

I've been using Kagi for a while now and I'm never going back to Google. Everything is just so much better when you are not the product.

The feature that sold me was the domain block feature. Search results are so much better when they dont include SEO'd garbage, sites with entirely AI generated content, or userbenchmark.com

Google a long time ago did that, but I assume those sites are where they get money from and so they removed that choice.

Re: Using Kagi Search with Low Vision

#78
I paid $10/month to Kagi for 3 months. During that time I quickly learned that Kagi's image results were just repackaged google image search; literally the same images returned in the same order as google image search.

I also noticed that Kagi does not ever return more than 250 results. Just 250. Kagi is not the kind of search engine that is useful for someone who is used to web surfing in the kind of style that emerged in the 90s/00s. It is more of a curated corporate search engine that tells you what it thinks you want to see. You are never allowed the resources/results to actually look for yourself.

In the end it was the later that put me off using it. Even though other search engines have been gimped as well (Google only returns a maximum of 400 search results these days, Bing 900, etc) 250 was just far too small to be useful.

Re: Using Kagi Search with Low Vision

#79
post #32

Kagi has been one of my all time favorite products. It has enriched my search experience drastically. One of my favorite features I don't see talked about enough is the keybindings. Using vim keys for navigating search results is such a fantastic user experience, and much like normal vim I'm not sure I could go back to navigating search any other way. I also really appreciate their AI quick-search feature is explicit…

I just don't understand how they can think that not giving me a single free search per month is a good idea. I used Kagi when they still had a free plan and it was fine but I still preferred Google. Now I can't even try it again to see if it has additional value.

This approach ignores 99% of the value of Kagi. Google provides atrocious results compared to Kagi once you've taken a few minutes to use the basic Kagi features.

Re: Using Kagi Search with Low Vision

#80
I have been using Kagi for years. I use the family plan for my wife and I. I love it and will continue to use it until it either gets bad, they sell it, or get an ipo. There is no noise. Google, to me is just filled with noise. I used to love the innovation and used many of their products. Their search is now filled with ads and you no longer get good results, in my opinion. Their AI will also have ads: https://blog.google/products/ads-commerce/google-marketing-l... Kagi is refreshing, the results have gotten very good. Occasionally there have been poor results with items at the top that should not have been, but I have noticed that it has been corrected quite quickly. Kagi does not retain any of your search terms nor does Kagi Assisstant. To me, Kagi gives me results like google used to, there are No ads, and they do not retain your search terms. I will gladly pay for that.
Post reply on HN