Live data from Hacker News

CARA 2.0 – “I Built a Better Robot Dog”

aaedmusa.com

71–72 of 72 posts

Re: CARA 2.0 – “I Built a Better Robot Dog”

#71
post #3

3 DOF per leg, so it needs 12 motors and controllers. Getting that under $1000 is nice. Here's the US$18 motor: [1] Those things are getting really cheap. He did have to rewind it, though, for more turns with thinner wire. The manufacturer mentions that you can order with "custom Kv", which means you might be able to get a different winding from the factory if you order a reasonable quantity. Especially if you tell t…

Not my field so I'm likely using the wrong name for the concept, anyway, don't stepping (bistable) brakes exist? I mean, one pulse to one pin engages and one pulse to another pin disengages, just like step relays, with the current consumption being zero when it's not operated so that the robot can be kept indefinitely in resting position without wasting energy to keep motors stalled.

Stepping motors are not good at stationary power consumption. They use power even with no load on them.

Brakes for robot joints are common in industrial robots. They're usually part of the emergency stop system. If power fails, the controller crashes, or someone pushes the emergency stop button, spring-driven brakes lock all major joints to stop all motion.[1] That might be useful in a quadruped, which can park without active balance.

[1] https://www.techbriefs.com/component/content/article/28812-c...

Re: CARA 2.0 – “I Built a Better Robot Dog”

#72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah agree. Having to rewind the motors just adds yet another task to the list for someone trying to build this thing. Also BLDC based motors in bots seem to be popular now, used to be steppers and harmonic drives from what I remember reading. Idk why electrostatic actuators aren't getting more popular like HASEL and a few papers on ones using fiber pumps come out recently. I suppose the danger that the high voltages…

> surely we can replicate muscle fiber actions Considering what muscle fiber looks like on the molecular level you're literally describing nanotechnology and the associated nanofabrication techniques. Surely it's possible to do but we don't seem to be there just yet.

Yeah for sure, I have read up a decent but on muscle fiber structure & the ATP (I think) ratcheting system.

With nano or at least micro manufacturing technology could make millions of ultra small magnets across a strand and try to use them to hook/unhook and shift two surfaces against each other.

I even thought it may be cool to try experimenting with piezoelectrics - could have two sub-fibers made of a piezoelectric material with a sawtooth type shaped etched in then see if applying signals that "walk" up the sub-fiber pulls them along each other.

Whelp, if I ever won the lottery I'd spend my days trying out things like that I suppose.

Post reply on HN