And it's a f:ing subscription delete
How do you expect the developers to pay for the service? Map tiles alone are already very expensive and data heavy.
Six years perfecting maps on watchOS
71–80 of 130 posts
Re: Six years perfecting maps on watchOS
#72The fact that there is no 1st party Apple made hiking and topography map on the Apple Watch is such a failure, not even on the most expensive “made for explorers” Watch Ultra. And things like gpx import is just a mere dream It’s a lifestyle device after all but still
> no 1st party Apple made hiking and topography map on the Apple Watch I regularly use hiking and topography maps on my Apple Watch with the first party maps app, so it sure what you’re talking about
Re: Six years perfecting maps on watchOS
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
The use of the cartographer to generate separate designs and the technology used to render/deliver those designs are two entirely separate concerns. His original map provider offers both vector and raster tile services: https://www.thunderforest.com/maps/outdoors/ A common pattern is to use a vector tile service + style definition directly or to generate raster tiles if those are desired.
Good point, I assumed he was using images because his screenshots show text perfectly following the curves of rivers, which seems hard to do with dynamic rendering.
Re: Six years perfecting maps on watchOS
#74The fact that there is no 1st party Apple made hiking and topography map on the Apple Watch is such a failure, not even on the most expensive “made for explorers” Watch Ultra. And things like gpx import is just a mere dream It’s a lifestyle device after all but still
Apple is so intent on making the Apple Watch a catch-all that it doesn’t necessarily do any specific activity amazingly. After three Apple Watches over many years I finally sold my 10 last year and won’t be buying another. I bought a Coros and am pretty pleased with it, would consider a Garmin in the future. Coros and Garmin devices are built with activity in mind and not unneeded apps, like Uber. Garmin and Coros bo…
Re: Six years perfecting maps on watchOS
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
How do you expect the developers to pay for the service? Map tiles alone are already very expensive and data heavy.
https://openfreemap.org
Re: Six years perfecting maps on watchOS
#76The fact that there is no 1st party Apple made hiking and topography map on the Apple Watch is such a failure, not even on the most expensive “made for explorers” Watch Ultra. And things like gpx import is just a mere dream It’s a lifestyle device after all but still
Re: Six years perfecting maps on watchOS
#77Re: Six years perfecting maps on watchOS
#78Re: Six years perfecting maps on watchOS
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
How do you expect the developers to pay for the service? Map tiles alone are already very expensive and data heavy.
https://openfreemap.org
This would presumably transfer the need to host map data back to the author, which would represent an ongoing cost, and therefore maybe justify a modest subscription?
Re: Six years perfecting maps on watchOS
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
> there is no 1st party Apple made hiking and topography map on the Apple Watch is such a failure I remember a time when Apple was chided for integrating functionalities of popular apps into its OS. Apple created an incredibly awesome device, and its up to the market to make full use of its potential. Why would it be a failure for Apple to not make such an app?
Because they don't allow deeper integrations maybe? I still don't have a watch face layout I like.
So I wouldn't say it's a failure that they don't do that even more often.