Live data from Hacker News

GitHub Copilot code review will start consuming GitHub Actions minutes

github.blog

71–80 of 222 posts

Re: GitHub Copilot code review will start consuming GitHub Actions minutes

#71

Anyone have good alternatives for ci/cd on the cheap for a solo dev? I’m blowing through my 1000 mins in days. Thinking to either pool some free tiers or figure something out with spot instances. Also is it just me or is CI/CD tooling still sort of rough all around.

There is a free tier for on-prem TeamCity.

Re: GitHub Copilot code review will start consuming GitHub Actions minutes

#72
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Its also a weird way to cede control of the market to the foreign model vendors, because I'm reasonably sure that DeepSeek et al aren't subsidising tokens to the same extent that the big 3's subscription models have been.

I think there's "sort of" a moat for non-Chinese vendors. As much as people distrust the US right now, I think deep down inside everyone knows that the second you let a Chinese provider do inference on your codebase they're gonna suck up every bit of it. But hey, cheap tokens, right? So you'll probably never see government customers allow that and neither will a lot of commercial customers.

Fortunately there’s plenty of open weight models that are just safetensors and you have a wide variety of providers to choose from, as well as just hosting it yourself.

Re: GitHub Copilot code review will start consuming GitHub Actions minutes

#73
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

[flagged]

You didn’t bring down GitHub. You brought down the thread.

There’s a difference between criticizing a company and just swapping names for insults. The former can be useful, the latter just turns the discussion into noise. If you’ve got a point about Copilot or the review feature, make it. Otherwise it’s hard to see what anyone is supposed to take away from “ShitHub” other than childish shit-posting.

Re: GitHub Copilot code review will start consuming GitHub Actions minutes

#75
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

You didn’t bring down GitHub. You brought down the thread. There’s a difference between criticizing a company and just swapping names for insults. The former can be useful, the latter just turns the discussion into noise. If you’ve got a point about Copilot or the review feature, make it. Otherwise it’s hard to see what anyone is supposed to take away from “ShitHub” other than childish shit-posting.

I really don't understand your point. You're saying we're turning discussions into noise and continuing to spam comments that are not even related to topic. Hard to take this seriously other than just bullying because you get triggered by a word. I concede there's no point replying to you anymore although I tried to reason about your meaness.

Re: GitHub Copilot code review will start consuming GitHub Actions minutes

#76
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think there's "sort of" a moat for non-Chinese vendors. As much as people distrust the US right now, I think deep down inside everyone knows that the second you let a Chinese provider do inference on your codebase they're gonna suck up every bit of it. But hey, cheap tokens, right? So you'll probably never see government customers allow that and neither will a lot of commercial customers.

Why do we assume us providers aren't doing the same? Also all the Chinese providers are giving open weight models. Many you can run locally. I don't see the risk. If your code is easily AI generated you don't have a moat anyways. A Chinese competitor probably won't have as easy of a time as a US one of you operate in the US

The US has robust IP and trademark law that allows companies some amount of chance to find a legal remedy to anyone who clones their business. China is notorious for protecting local companies from foreign IP suits.

Further, at a lot of companies, the risk has to be acceptable to shareholders and auditors. Perceived risk is often a more powerful motivator than actual risk.

Re: GitHub Copilot code review will start consuming GitHub Actions minutes

#77

Anyone have good alternatives for ci/cd on the cheap for a solo dev? I’m blowing through my 1000 mins in days. Thinking to either pool some free tiers or figure something out with spot instances. Also is it just me or is CI/CD tooling still sort of rough all around.

Your best bet is to self host woodpecker CI. Hetzner has cheap VPS that I host my CI on. It costs like $10/month. Pick the cheapest region, since CI runners location doesn’t matter much.

Yeah, I did hertzner runner for a bit.

But I think the issue is that my situation (solo dev, mono repo) is just not right for a dedicated instance.

With only 1-2 runners, the pipeline is slow (low parallelism) and resource constrained. And at least 50% of the time its idle (I'm not working/sleeping).

I guess what I'm really looking for is for some kind of aggressive autoscaling, and aggressive caching.

I tried a couple of things (GHA, Dagger + Hertzner, Buildkite)

And Im just not too sure theres going to be any out of the box solution since my priority is essentially to minimize cost and maximize efficiency. Not really a great customer for any providers.

Im tempted to just get agent to build something out quickly with cloudflare workers + spot instances.

I also have some other nice to have requirements:

- ts/code over config

- locally runnable and testable

- preferably no lock in

- repeatable/reproducible

Re: GitHub Copilot code review will start consuming GitHub Actions minutes

#78
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You didn’t bring down GitHub. You brought down the thread. There’s a difference between criticizing a company and just swapping names for insults. The former can be useful, the latter just turns the discussion into noise. If you’ve got a point about Copilot or the review feature, make it. Otherwise it’s hard to see what anyone is supposed to take away from “ShitHub” other than childish shit-posting.

I really don't understand your point. You're saying we're turning discussions into noise and continuing to spam comments that are not even related to topic. Hard to take this seriously other than just bullying because you get triggered by a word. I concede there's no point replying to you anymore although I tried to reason about your meaness.

[dead]

Re: GitHub Copilot code review will start consuming GitHub Actions minutes

#79
post #36

As financial markets get tighter AI companies will stop subsidizing their services and charge enough money to actually make a profit. It is time to setup local models. It is cheaper, and you already have a computer. Why keep it idle and pay someone else for their CPU?

Because it doesn't even come close to frontier models in intelligence/speed/price. I can run my 3090 nonstop and rack up an electricity bill that costs more than a subscription and get worse results that are slower. They are ok for simple/non complex things, but that's not really what I need AI for.

Well, it is currently cheaper because it is massively subsidized. That will change when subsidies stop. I don’t think it is a good argument.

Re: GitHub Copilot code review will start consuming GitHub Actions minutes

#80

Anyone have good alternatives for ci/cd on the cheap for a solo dev? I’m blowing through my 1000 mins in days. Thinking to either pool some free tiers or figure something out with spot instances. Also is it just me or is CI/CD tooling still sort of rough all around.

I have Gitea and Gitea Runner apps running on TrueNAS on an extra mini PC in a closet. Works better than GitHub for me.
Post reply on HN