> Somebody Should Have Been Fired For This
> And nobody got fired for this?
Not once do they explain what firing someone would actually improve?!
71–80 of 86 posts
> Somebody Should Have Been Fired For This
> And nobody got fired for this?
Not once do they explain what firing someone would actually improve?!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Do you think that the social climbers who approved these obviously crappy projects learned anything? Just the framing of this question makes it seem like you simply don't like people in management / decision-makers, and you want something bad to happen to them. Maybe that's wrong, hopefully it is, but the rest of the comment doesn't do much to dissuade me of that impression either.
Something bad to happen to "them"? There's no diaphanous them, just the specific social climbing crap decision makers facing no consequences of any type. I have worked with many hard working and caring managers, and they are generally eclipsed by said social climbers presenting at conferences every other week about know-nothing topics jumping from place to place leaving bankrupt companies and massive layoffs in their…
Autocorrect mistake? I doubt anyone was imaging semi-transparent beings wafting gently in a summer breeze.
So what would you call your alternative to blameless postmortems? FWIW, "walking the plank" is already in use.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Do you think that the social climbers who approved these obviously crappy projects learned anything? Just the framing of this question makes it seem like you simply don't like people in management / decision-makers, and you want something bad to happen to them. Maybe that's wrong, hopefully it is, but the rest of the comment doesn't do much to dissuade me of that impression either.
Something bad to happen to "them"? There's no diaphanous them, just the specific social climbing crap decision makers facing no consequences of any type. I have worked with many hard working and caring managers, and they are generally eclipsed by said social climbers presenting at conferences every other week about know-nothing topics jumping from place to place leaving bankrupt companies and massive layoffs in their…
You have a massive chip on your shoulder, dare I say that's why you've had many caring managers and now you're seeing them all as 'social climbers'.
Did one manager call you out on something and you torched the entire thing?
> A redesign that gets replaced 2 years later is a catastrophe. > Somebody Should Have Been Fired For This This person is not a good resource. Uber was a very fast growing company, both in terms of their product and staff. Turnover in architecture happens. Calling this a catastrophe and click baiting about firing engineers over a rounding error in Uber’s overall finances is gross. I understand this person is trying t…
It’s almost as if gatekeeping the correct developers isn’t working. So yeah somebody should get fired. They screened to prevent this. It wasn’t prevented.
Otherwise admit the screen doesn’t work and fire the gatekeepers who are relying on it and the inverted selection of correct engineers.
> A redesign that gets replaced 2 years later is a catastrophe. > Somebody Should Have Been Fired For This This person is not a good resource. Uber was a very fast growing company, both in terms of their product and staff. Turnover in architecture happens. Calling this a catastrophe and click baiting about firing engineers over a rounding error in Uber’s overall finances is gross. I understand this person is trying t…
This was particularly egregious:
> If you’re building a system that makes the economics of your company impossible, you’re better off not building it.
If I’m understanding the timeline here, Uber replaced this system in 2019, and saved 8 million doing so. In 2019 their revenue was something like 13 billion dollars. In no world was this system making the economics of Uber impossible.
Hate to say it but kind of a lousy article... zippy writing but lots of Monday Morning Quarterbacking for something the author doesn't seem to show much knowledge of. Maybe this is his style to gin up subscribers, but I'm not a fan. > But nobody was optimizing for cost. They were optimizing for their next promotion. Each rewrite was a new proposal, a new design doc, a new system to put on a resume. The incentive was…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Something bad to happen to "them"? There's no diaphanous them, just the specific social climbing crap decision makers facing no consequences of any type. I have worked with many hard working and caring managers, and they are generally eclipsed by said social climbers presenting at conferences every other week about know-nothing topics jumping from place to place leaving bankrupt companies and massive layoffs in their…
Why are you thinking more about the people that piss you off than the ones that you consider hard working and caring? You have a massive chip on your shoulder, dare I say that's why you've had many caring managers and now you're seeing them all as 'social climbers'. Did one manager call you out on something and you torched the entire thing?
This isn't unique to GP either, it's not exactly uncommon nowadays for people to hate the corpo-techbro MBA LinkedIn archetype.
Can I do a mea culpa? This is more than 3 decades back. I was a junior programmer (2-3 years in industry) sent to a client site in europe. You can imagine the state of systems those days. I wrote (or rather updated) a fix which would updated the discount and tax rates on orders based on new terms. It would run every day to account for ... whatever. You pick the values from master file, update all the orders and move…
If a single non-malicious code change can break a thing like that with nobody noticing that's a catastrophic failure in testing, QA, and operations (nobody noticed 20% of euros transacted just stopped). It's hard to blame that on IC engineer.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Something bad to happen to "them"? There's no diaphanous them, just the specific social climbing crap decision makers facing no consequences of any type. I have worked with many hard working and caring managers, and they are generally eclipsed by said social climbers presenting at conferences every other week about know-nothing topics jumping from place to place leaving bankrupt companies and massive layoffs in their…
>There's no diaphanous them Autocorrect mistake? I doubt anyone was imaging semi-transparent beings wafting gently in a summer breeze. So what would you call your alternative to blameless postmortems? FWIW, "walking the plank" is already in use.
I'd say the pirates had it right and keel hauling is the way to go.