Why, when you could just not use X though?
Bouncer: Block "crypto", "rage politics", and more from your X feed using AI
71–80 of 138 posts
Re: Bouncer: Block "crypto", "rage politics", and more from your X feed using AI
#721. Run LM Studio (download the Gemma 4 model), which has a 'local server' w/ API.
2. Use a more powerful LLM to write User Scripts (Greasemonkey, etc) to do whatever you want on any website you go to. Instruct it to connect to LM Studio.
3. Classify and highlight posts / comments based on any criteria that suits you. Summarize, delete from the DOM, etc., Just have fun.
Re: Bouncer: Block "crypto", "rage politics", and more from your X feed using AI
#73Re: Bouncer: Block "crypto", "rage politics", and more from your X feed using AI
#74Re: Bouncer: Block "crypto", "rage politics", and more from your X feed using AI
#75Re: Bouncer: Block "crypto", "rage politics", and more from your X feed using AI
#76I don't think that automated filtering on conditionals like "rage politics" is a good idea. At best, you're going to end up with a confusing feed that contains reactions to the outrage without the actual outrage that's driving them; at worst, you're going to end up systematically misinformed on political topics that people find outrageous.
> you're going to end up systematically misinformed on political topics that people find outrageous. That sounds... fine?
Re: Bouncer: Block "crypto", "rage politics", and more from your X feed using AI
#77Why, when you could just not use X though?
Re: Bouncer: Block "crypto", "rage politics", and more from your X feed using AI
#78There would be absolutely nothing of substance left on X without crypto and rage politics
Russians recently joined in and, they're fuckin' hilarious in a way that only Russians could be: https://imgur.com/GaTnQk7.jpg
The people who hate Musk/X always out themselves by flagrantly lying about it/him.
Re: Bouncer: Block "crypto", "rage politics", and more from your X feed using AI
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
> you're going to end up systematically misinformed on political topics that people find outrageous. That sounds... fine?
I would emphasize mis informed, not un informed. If Policy X has 30% of people politely supportive, 20% of people politely opposed, and 50% of people incandescently furious about it, you're going to mistakenly think it has majority support.
/rant