71–74 of 74 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's just better on the eyes. I've tried the Kindle too. Nothing is comparable to printed ink on paper.
Speak for yourself. Black text on white paper is unreadable. Too much glare. There is no dark mode for printed books with only a few rare exceptions.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> print books can’t get yoinked off my shelf because a rich person with political connections wants that. Yes except where rich people fund political book-banning groups to do that. ref: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/12/books/book-bans-libraries...
With respect, this is just propaganda. That is not about banning books, that is about keep certain kinds of books out of school libraries. School libraries already kept other classes of books. This reminds of when Gavin Newsome or Pink tried to claim conservatives states banned "To Kill a Mocking Bird," which was not only untrue but it was the case that in their foolishness, they did not realize California banned the…
Keeping unliked books out of school libraries by banning them - that is about banning them. I feel propaganda isn't the best label for what is an accurate portrayal.
source: parent of 5 FL school kids
Earlier quoted context omitted.
With respect, this is just propaganda. That is not about banning books, that is about keep certain kinds of books out of school libraries. School libraries already kept other classes of books. This reminds of when Gavin Newsome or Pink tried to claim conservatives states banned "To Kill a Mocking Bird," which was not only untrue but it was the case that in their foolishness, they did not realize California banned the…
> That is not about banning books, that is about keep certain kinds of books out of school libraries. Keeping unliked books out of school libraries by banning them - that is about banning them. I feel propaganda isn't the best label for what is an accurate portrayal. source: parent of 5 FL school kids