71–73 of 73 posts
It's not a rule, it's a law passed by Congress and signed by the President in 1978. You can't just ignore it.
Even when their edicts are overturned by the courts they suffer no consequences.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The kind of gymnastics where they're justified burning our society down because that society dared to give nominally equal rights to colored folks. Claiming it's about immigration law enforcement is just the same disingenuous smokescreen as the rest of their movement's appeals to lofty ideals.
>Claiming it's about immigration law enforcement is just the same disingenuous smokescreen That’s not a claim. It’s the truth. You guys are totally lost.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’m not sure what to tell you if you don’t understand the difference between an elected official actively and purposefully defying the constitution in order to directly weaken our institutions, and people wanting our immigration laws to be less strict.
You probably don't have to tell me anything, because I'd be right and you'd be wrong. "Wanting" immigration laws to be "less strict" (mass illegal immigration in the tens of millions, sensible) != breaking the law. The mental gymnastics people do to fit in with their chosen ideology is insane to see, worse when your mouths open up and try to explain these broken thoughts.