Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft suspends dev accounts for high-profile open source projects

bleepingcomputer.com

71–80 of 140 posts

Re: Microsoft suspends dev accounts for high-profile open source projects

#74
post #69
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No they won't, because Apple is out of reach for their pockets, and most OEMs still don't sell Linux powered devices on the shops people go to.

The Neo changes things. Only $600.

It is 800 euros for 8 GB device, no thanks, especially in coutries where many dream of getting 1000 euros a month.

Re: Microsoft suspends dev accounts for high-profile open source projects

#75
post #27

lol, Microslop shooting themselves in the foot once again. At this point people will move to MacOS or Linux because so much damage to their brand can’t simply be ignored anymore.

Apple has done the exact same with its iphone app store, lots of companies got shut down because of their app not beeing available anymore with no explanation. The problem is with exclusive app stores.

Apple requires notorization for applications outside their store too.

Re: Microsoft suspends dev accounts for high-profile open source projects

#76
post #68

Owwwwww...... :D I've no idea whether MS either has a veeeeery clever plan about what they are doing, and I just don't get it, or whether that's just completely stupid in the current times when Windows' fanbase is somewhat declining anyways. On the other hand, people always have a hard time understanding the trouble they order when they let things centralize too much. When they are too okay with depending on e.g. Big…

Satya Nadella had built up so much Microsoft goodwill from 2014 - 2022. When they first purchased Github, it looked like Microsoft was opening up and was going good things.

The first sign things were souring was when Microsoft dumped their gaming plans after just buying up all he major studios. First sign they only cared about Azure and AI.

Now it's blatantly obvious they're giving up everything to chase enterprise AI.

Re: Microsoft suspends dev accounts for high-profile open source projects

#77
> Wednesday, Microsoft Vice President Scott Hanselman said the developer accounts were automatically suspended because they failed the "mandatory account verification for all partners in the Windows Hardware Program who have not completed account verification since April 2024" that the company had been emailing "everyone" about since October 2025.

It doesn't sound like suspention, because they would be able to fill out the form and get unsuspended. This is closer to account termination.

Re: Microsoft suspends dev accounts for high-profile open source projects

#78

Microsoft loves sending emails with "Action required" in the subject, when actually no action is required, or it doesn't apply to you, or whatever. Such corporate speak. It's fun searching your email for "Action required" and finding all the things you were supposed to do and it turns out didn't need to do anything about.

I was told by awareness training that e-mails titled "Action required" are phishing mails.

Re: Microsoft suspends dev accounts for high-profile open source projects

#79
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Crying wolf" constantly like this is so frustrating. It waters down the message until they send something you really need to worry about, which you ignore like the rest of the pointless messages.

What marketing/sales/HR types don’t seem to understand is that when everything is the highest priority, nothing is.

This is a bit off topic, but I always say that priority is a ranking of actual demands, it is an ordering, one that needs curating and keeping updated based on context and changes in environment.

Nothing else works for prioritisation, any other categorising into "High/Medium/Low" just fails.

By doing so you end up with the nonsense we had at a company I once worked for, where stories were all put in medium.

This was because stories in low were simply never actioned, they'd never ever get done, everyone came to implicitly understand this. It was still a useful dumping ground for the kinds of stories you know you ought to do, but no-one wanted to do, but it was useful to have noted on record. But for prioritising actual work, it was useless.

Stories in High had a special process defined in a handbook that no-one wanted the hassle of dealing with.

So everything was Medium.

This had obvious problems, and it grew larger than could be managed.

So "Just Above Medium" was born, for stories that were higher priority than your everyday stories in Medium.

This in time grew too, so "Just Above Just Above Medium" (aka JAJAM) was born.

By the time I started, there was even a "JAJAM+" category, for stories that had to be fast-tracked through the process too.

The whole thing essentially fell back to having the product/development leads come to an understanding of what work needed to be done. Which is the right way to do it, but that should simply be made more explicit and part of the process by simply having all stories ranked.

Then you don't need the mental overhead of trying to decide in a design meeting if something is "Just above Medium" or just above that...

Re: Microsoft suspends dev accounts for high-profile open source projects

#80
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Crying wolf" constantly like this is so frustrating. It waters down the message until they send something you really need to worry about, which you ignore like the rest of the pointless messages.

What marketing/sales/HR types don’t seem to understand is that when everything is the highest priority, nothing is.

But it is MY highest priority!
Post reply on HN