Live data from Hacker News

Iran says it will target US tech companies in Middle East

thehill.com

71–80 of 95 posts

Re: Iran says it will target US tech companies in Middle East

#71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I realize Qatar is in an "it's complicated" relationship, it's just amusing to me that people feign shock that Iran would consider them fair game while omitting the detail of them kinda being a client state hosting a huge US military base.

The thing is, if we accept the norms that Qatar can be targeted for kinetic action by Iran for hosting US assets or by the US for hosting Iranian assets, then that opens a MASSIVE can of worms. This means Ukraine has the precedent in place to target the Chongqing–Xinjiang–Europe railway in Russia in retaliation for Chinese support of Russia [0]. This also means all of Europe is fair game to be striked by Russia in re…

There’s no “precedent” needed, Russia and Ukraine are simply choosing not to do certain things to avoid widening the war in the ways you mention, because they don’t think that would be to their advantage. The precedent is there already, it’s not like either country is looking at Iran and going “oh wow, I didn’t know that was an option!”

Re: Iran says it will target US tech companies in Middle East

#76
post #7

Has anyone else been having major reliability issues in me-south-1 since the attacks there? I've had to field several inquiries at work where the answer seems to be "sorry, there's a war on -- pick a different region".

Yes. Both me-south-1 and me-central-1 have been _heavily_ impacted/disrupted for nearly a month now due to drone strikes on infra.

Related: https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/26/aws_would_prefer_to_f...

>"AWS is waiving all usage-related charges in the ME-CENTRAL-1 Region for March 2026. This waiver applies automatically to your account(s), and no action is required from you."

Re: Iran says it will target US tech companies in Middle East

#77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

So you think a foreign distributer for some random Israeli agricultural product is a legitimate target? That's disturbing.

I mean during ww2 civilians and supply chains were bombed to hell and back.

now this is a "small", "far away" war, so killing civilians isn't expected, but for them a supplier of agricultural products is feeding the soldiers that will be stomping their heads if this keeps escalating.

I'm not justifying anyone here, I'm just pointing out how ridiculous it sounds when we try to define a set of rules to kill each other and then say they are violating them, when we know that the good guys bombed whole cities to the ground, and will bomb whole cities to the ground, when it matters.

there's so much hate in the region that this stuff will only end one way, and I personally don't want to see Iran winning this, but let's call war by it's name.

Re: Iran says it will target US tech companies in Middle East

#78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So you think a foreign distributer for some random Israeli agricultural product is a legitimate target? That's disturbing.

I mean during ww2 civilians and supply chains were bombed to hell and back. now this is a "small", "far away" war, so killing civilians isn't expected, but for them a supplier of agricultural products is feeding the soldiers that will be stomping their heads if this keeps escalating. I'm not justifying anyone here, I'm just pointing out how ridiculous it sounds when we try to define a set of rules to kill each other…

How should the Israelis be expected to respond if Iran starts deliberately killing large numbers of civilians? You only have to follow the laws of war if your enemy is making an attempt to follow them.

Re: Iran says it will target US tech companies in Middle East

#79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean during ww2 civilians and supply chains were bombed to hell and back. now this is a "small", "far away" war, so killing civilians isn't expected, but for them a supplier of agricultural products is feeding the soldiers that will be stomping their heads if this keeps escalating. I'm not justifying anyone here, I'm just pointing out how ridiculous it sounds when we try to define a set of rules to kill each other…

How should the Israelis be expected to respond if Iran starts deliberately killing large numbers of civilians? You only have to follow the laws of war if your enemy is making an attempt to follow them.

Iran has a right to defend itself doesn't it? All Israelis with the exception of the Haredi serve in the Israeli Occupation Force.

Re: Iran says it will target US tech companies in Middle East

#80
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> remember that its the regular people, the working class of Iran that is actually suffering further because of hostilities initiated by US/Israel This is true of any war. That’s damning for the party that starts a war of choice. But it’s no vindication for the regime that’s built itself up as a regional pest, including sponsor of actual terrorism against ordinary people, for years.

You realise that no vindication for the regime that’s built itself up as a regional pest, including sponsor of actual terrorism against ordinary people, for years. is a valid descriptor of the US as well?

America hasn't really been a regional pest unless we expand the scope of region to cover two continents. Not until this administration. And the U.S. is not a systematic sponsor of terrorism the way Tehran has become. Even e.g. the Afghan Mujahideen wasn't known to target civilians the way Hamas and Hezbollah have been.
Post reply on HN