Live data from Hacker News

Full network of clitoral nerves mapped out for first time

theguardian.com

71–80 of 189 posts

Re: Full network of clitoral nerves mapped out for first time

#71

That 4chan pretends its Hacker News thread still lives in my head. I still remember "Show HN: Clitly, my app for finding the Clitoris".

https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/48696148

Thanks for sharing. Hilarious and somewhat accurate...

Re: Full network of clitoral nerves mapped out for first time

#72
post #69
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Being removed for versions 25 to 38… honestly confirms the feminist narrative of some people being idiots, though. Like, imagine documentation on object oriented programming being removed because it offended some functional programming folks.

There is obviously truth to it but it does not confirm the whig interpretation i.e. it was supposedly _removed_ rather than never present

This might be the first casual reference I've seen to whig history, is that memeplex picking up steam?

Re: Full network of clitoral nerves mapped out for first time

#73
post #59
post #17

> the clitoris did not even make it into standard anatomy textbooks until the 38th edition of Gray’s Anatomy was published in 1995. This seemed surprising, as it hews too close to an annoying meme in feminism and history generally, that people in prior eras were idiots. And it turns out to be wrong. The clitoris was in Gray's Anatomy until 1947, when it was removed by the editor Charles Goss for the 25th edition. See…

Being removed for versions 25 to 38… honestly confirms the feminist narrative of some people being idiots, though. Like, imagine documentation on object oriented programming being removed because it offended some functional programming folks.

I think it communicates maliciousness not idiocy

Re: Full network of clitoral nerves mapped out for first time

#74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Male genital mutilation is very common

Respectfully, this article is not about the male experience, it's okay to talk about women without putting men in the story.

On some levels yes, but if the male experience isn't being talked about, then no.

If we were to talk about domestic violence the automatic assumption is male against female. Ignoring the fact that a third of victims are men. That isn't exactly a small minority, before you take into account that it probably an undercount as no one talks about men getting abused.

The same goes for breast cancer. Men can get it, its almost never talked about.

Re: Full network of clitoral nerves mapped out for first time

#75
post #73
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Being removed for versions 25 to 38… honestly confirms the feminist narrative of some people being idiots, though. Like, imagine documentation on object oriented programming being removed because it offended some functional programming folks.

I think it communicates maliciousness not idiocy

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor

Re: Full network of clitoral nerves mapped out for first time

#76
post #59
post #17

> the clitoris did not even make it into standard anatomy textbooks until the 38th edition of Gray’s Anatomy was published in 1995. This seemed surprising, as it hews too close to an annoying meme in feminism and history generally, that people in prior eras were idiots. And it turns out to be wrong. The clitoris was in Gray's Anatomy until 1947, when it was removed by the editor Charles Goss for the 25th edition. See…

Being removed for versions 25 to 38… honestly confirms the feminist narrative of some people being idiots, though. Like, imagine documentation on object oriented programming being removed because it offended some functional programming folks.

I am not aware of actual code removal but skirting in that direction there was a movement, just a couple years back, to replace words that had become more offensive than they were in the recent past. One example is renaming master to main.

I am not stating any opinion for or against any words or terms in this context.

Re: Full network of clitoral nerves mapped out for first time

#77
post #17

> the clitoris did not even make it into standard anatomy textbooks until the 38th edition of Gray’s Anatomy was published in 1995. This seemed surprising, as it hews too close to an annoying meme in feminism and history generally, that people in prior eras were idiots. And it turns out to be wrong. The clitoris was in Gray's Anatomy until 1947, when it was removed by the editor Charles Goss for the 25th edition. See…

> annoying meme in feminism and history generally, that people in prior eras were idiots

This sounds like a strawman to me but I’m not well versed in feminism. Do you have examples? On the topic of science, isn’t the criticism more that women were largely ignored or misrepresented in scientific studies? This doesn’t have to be because the authors were “idiots”.

Re: Full network of clitoral nerves mapped out for first time

#78
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it communicates maliciousness not idiocy

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor

This gets complicated when the malicious have also read the saying and intentionally feign stupidity, but that's just chaos politics.

Re: Full network of clitoral nerves mapped out for first time

#79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Male genital mutilation is very common

presumably you are referring to circumcision, which has recognized benefits.

Very weakly supported benefits, to be weighed against quite severe risks and frequent issues.

Re: Full network of clitoral nerves mapped out for first time

#80
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it communicates maliciousness not idiocy

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor

Keep word: adequately. This is not adequately explained by stupidity.
Post reply on HN